Has the servers been modified for the new capacity of c4? If it has, thats a LOT more players we have now. Maybe it is time to consider opening up a new server or 2?
It has been said that the full status is a bit misleading since the upgrade of the servers to 64bit. That they are working on making the term more accurate.
Myself and several others have recieved the server full message and have been denied access. Even when they do upgrade the text it will still read full. The population is big enough to introduce a few new servers, whats the big deal with it, you can only profit from new servers.
Lionna say full then and then, always done, but full meens about 70%+ full, it does not meen more can't connect, I have never ben not alowed to connect to Lionna due 'full'.
This was the same in C3 to, specaily under chrissmass almost all servers where full then and then, was some poilt 8/9 servers stated full.
Has the servers been modified for the new capacity of c4? If it has, thats a LOT more players we have now. Maybe it is time to consider opening up a new server or 2?
the word full has many meanings, in the server status it means not empty :p
Teon was unaccessible in late C3/start of C4. It had Full as status and it really was full, sometimes people hammered the login for _hours_ to get in. Just hoping it doesnt happen again since lots of people left the game because of that. NCSoft woke up too late on that subject. Wasnt really fun to hammer every time you wanted to play for over a month, and then when you could log NPC servers would crash all the time or the whole server would just go boom for no apparent reason.