Well it was the same fight until all the people you ****** off showed up. lmao
Originally, it was Republic, Requiem, and GG vs Synergy, Pignation, Barely Legal
I checked the signup, and it was Synergy and Pignation defending, and Republic, Requiem, GG, and SoS attacking Pretty much the same fight. Well, add in SoS, but if you own a castle, don't you pretty much expect the people you are at war with to show up to attack you?
Truthfully though, when it got close to siege time, I'd say nearly twice the number of signed attackers showed up.
As I mentioned in the other thread, we didn't invite all those people, nor did we ask them to come. I heard they just wanted some PvP.
You won't ever hear me complaining about zerg after us. Anyone of us on our side that really thought we wouldn't have half the server gunning for us when we are picking fights with **** near everyone is just plain silly. I enjoy having this many enemies to fight tbh but I find some of the trash talking peons on the enemy side irritating at times. Having this many enemies I still traveled all over aden for an hour last night and could only find 1 enemy to kill, this makes me sad... :confused:
You won't ever hear me complaining about zerg after us. Anyone of us on our side that really thought we wouldn't have half the server gunning for us when we are picking fights with **** near everyone is just plain silly. I enjoy having this many enemies to fight tbh but I find some of the trash talking peons on the enemy side irritating at times. Having this many enemies I still traveled all over aden for an hour last night and could only find 1 enemy to kill, this makes me sad... :confused:
Did you check Dion?
lol.. sorry Lick, just can't resist busting your balls, and the opportunity doesn't present itself often.
FTR, Repub, Req, and GG do keep comms open during a siege. The other clans/allys that showed up did not have open comms with us, there may have been some chatting going on between leaders, but it wasn't like that force was being lead by a single person. It was our 3 alliances lead by Salao, and everyone else doing their own thing.
So really, it doesn't qualify as a zerg, since a zerg by definition would be lead by 1 person. I must admit though, it did look a bit zergy, but that's because everyone was all using the same /target macro. LOL
**EDIT** Ain't it a [censored] trying to defend a castle when you are signed Dusk? That port two towns away thing is BS if ya ask me. I mean if you are an approved defender you should respawn inside the castle regardless. I always thought that rule was just stupid.
i remember when PK was at war with my Former clan IP, honestly i never hid, i leveled in the same places i normally did and never saw trouble. one day me and a fellow DA actually went to Wall of argos and killed a few guys, it was fun :).
i remember when PK was at war with my Former clan IP, honestly i never hid, i leveled in the same places i normally did and never saw trouble. one day me and a fellow DA actually went to Wall of argos and killed a few guys, it was fun :).
[censored] "me and a friend DA " killed some pk's u got to be kidding us! if it's true i will rerololl!!!!!!!
They lost the castle because the simple fact BarleyLegal wasnt there. We are having our own plans though thrown into the mess, stay tuned for next seige week....
You won't ever hear me complaining about zerg after us. Anyone of us on our side that really thought we wouldn't have half the server gunning for us when we are picking fights with **** near everyone is just plain silly. I enjoy having this many enemies to fight tbh but I find some of the trash talking peons on the enemy side irritating at times. Having this many enemies I still traveled all over aden for an hour last night and could only find 1 enemy to kill, this makes me sad... :confused:
Did you check Dion?
lol.. sorry Lick, just can't resist busting your balls, and the opportunity doesn't present itself often.
FTR, Repub, Req, and GG do keep comms open during a siege. The other clans/allys that showed up did not have open comms with us, there may have been some chatting going on between leaders, but it wasn't like that force was being lead by a single person. It was our 3 alliances lead by Salao, and everyone else doing their own thing.
So really, it doesn't qualify as a zerg, since a zerg by definition would be lead by 1 person. I must admit though, it did look a bit zergy, but that's because everyone was all using the same /target macro. LOL
**EDIT** Ain't it a [censored] trying to defend a castle when you are signed Dusk? That port two towns away thing is BS if ya ask me. I mean if you are an approved defender you should respawn inside the castle regardless. I always thought that rule was just stupid.
Doesn't a zerg specifically NOT have 1 leader and just a bunch of people overwhelming the opponents without much organization? In that case this would qualify and it would be a good example! But it is an effective tactic nonetheless.
Some peoples idea of a good strategy is to play way more then we do and have a lot of high levels. Our idea is to enjoy life, and play this game. Thusly numbers and not levels is our strength.
When beer starts tasting bad, we can switch to your "opinion" of how the game should be played.
Some peoples idea of a good strategy is to play way more then we do and have a lot of high levels. Our idea is to enjoy life, and play this game. Thusly numbers and not levels is our strength.
When beer starts tasting bad, we can switch to your "opinion" of how the game should be played.
There's always whisky, I agree with the rest though