Havent really paid attention to politics of late, but was watchign teh Dion siege from a character i luckily left in game, and i saw ... WLE, NM, SOS, HG and Republic on the same field, but i thought NM and Republic hated SOS, along with HG, or at least thats what i gathered from teh flame fests over the forums, im just a bit lost atm :confused:
the only politics that stay static is the server remains against synergy, all other alliances ignore there hatred of each other to take down synergy because non of them can do anything by themselfs. This has been true since AEA was fromed in prelude, a bunch of clans and alliances they didnt really like each other band together to take down an organized powerful force. Its still true today.
the only politics that stay static is the server remains against synergy, all other alliances ignore there hatred of each other to take down synergy because non of them can do anything by themselfs. This has been true since AEA was fromed in prelude, a bunch of clans and alliances they didnt really like each other band together to take down an organized powerful force. Its still true today.
the only politics that stay static is the server remains against synergy, all other alliances ignore there hatred of each other to take down synergy because non of them can do anything by themselfs. This has been true since AEA was fromed in prelude, a bunch of clans and alliances they didnt really like each other band together to take down an organized powerful force. Its still true today.
flame on
....
Are you for real?
....
Lets start at the beginning. Of Syn that is. Members of 2 warring alliance drop tags to create a new alliance. An alliance that does not care about politics, but basically PvPs whoever they wish at the time, and threaten with KOS/apocalypse/ragnarok/yo-mamma jokes whenever someone goes out of their way to kill them.
And then you have the gall (or stupidity) to come here and [censored] at the rest of the server cos they started organizing against you!?
the only politics that stay static is the server remains against synergy, all other alliances ignore there hatred of each other to take down synergy because non of them can do anything by themselfs. This has been true since AEA was fromed in prelude, a bunch of clans and alliances they didnt really like each other band together to take down an organized powerful force. Its still true today.
flame on
....
Are you for real?
....
Lets start at the beginning. Of Syn that is. Members of 2 warring alliance drop tags to create a new alliance. An alliance that does not care about politics, but basically PvPs whoever they wish at the time, and threaten with KOS/apocalypse/ragnarok/yo-mamma jokes whenever someone goes out of their way to kill them.
And then you have the gall (or stupidity) to come here and [censored] at the rest of the server cos they started organizing against you!?
wow....
Just bloody wow...
there no [censored], we have all those wars for a reason. my point is all other alliances will put there politics on pause to take down synergy (same as with ea in the past)...gf
the only politics that stay static is the server remains against synergy, all other alliances ignore there hatred of each other to take down synergy because non of them can do anything by themselfs. This has been true since AEA was fromed in prelude, a bunch of clans and alliances they didnt really like each other band together to take down an organized powerful force. Its still true today.
flame on
....
Are you for real?
....
Lets start at the beginning. Of Syn that is. Members of 2 warring alliance drop tags to create a new alliance. An alliance that does not care about politics, but basically PvPs whoever they wish at the time, and threaten with KOS/apocalypse/ragnarok/yo-mamma jokes whenever someone goes out of their way to kill them.
And then you have the gall (or stupidity) to come here and [censored] at the rest of the server cos they started organizing against you!?
wow....
Just bloody wow...
there no [censored], we have all those wars for a reason. my point is all other alliances will put there politics on pause to take down synergy (same as with ea in the past)...gf
So how is that different from members of 2 warring alliances putting their differences aside and fighting under the same flag?
Two peoples finding a common goal to go at is different than two peoples who dislike eachother fighting for a common cause and considering it a holy crusade. But its humor triumphs over its accomplishments. Allow me to show you curtosy of Daya: HugoBossMeaningEveryWord (http://members.shaw.ca/yizmajlowicz/Hugo.JPG). Note special emphasis on the beginning of the bottom left pic!
A lot of those alliances didn't put differences aside to fight synergy. They put their difference aside to fight the RB farmers your so close too. Mutiny the fact that some of those alliances share synergy as a common enemy doesn't mean that everyone is AEA, Syn is old EA and that your Verloren. As far as everyone putting wars down to fight syn the only thing I can tell you is stop flattering yourself. The planet doesn't spin around botted/pled losers.
Ohh noes MSB's secret weapon! I guess people like Lydian can kiss up to kami and suck up to him for help in pvp but fighterhugo and g4 can't put differences aside. I guess MSB showed us how its done by making peace with so many former NM and adding them to synergy alliance.
I wonder when the "OMG, REPUBLIC TRYING TO RUN THE SERVER!!!!" Crap gonna start, i mean afterall you guys have 2 castles now, so your in the 'Destroying the server' bracket now!!!
I wonder when the "OMG, REPUBLIC TRYING TO RUN THE SERVER!!!!" Crap gonna start, i mean afterall you guys have 2 castles now, so your in the 'Destroying the server' bracket now!!!
As soon as they turn into griefers, "train" levelers, farmers, and become incompetently led like Synergy?
so your in the 'Destroying the server' bracket now
LOL
GETUM BANNIC! Our incompetant players left treads all over the place, and give you something to post about hours a day. Its been a pleasure being the source of your flames and conservation of your identity.
was funny to be there!
i just wonder what would have happen if syn werent there:
1. NM send out BudLight to flame on boards "botters of synergy cant put up a fight and likes to pve more ... bla bla"
(just search at the board history when synergy wasnt in mood to fight 50 vs 200-500 ppl)
or my favorite
2. NM came to have FUN in PVP instead of hate and would have jumped on the battefield and cleans the ground who ever was there!
non-politcal kills just FUN!
but i think the 2nd option is too "EA" of us to be fullfilled by some else ~~
Well, we came for the fun and we did have a great time, im sure synergy did aswell that it got that serious with pignation was never the idea, I know I enjoyed the 2 hours of pvp... I told fetto before the siege that he could attack or not, I dont care who started because theres no way to prove nothing and it doesnt matter we came for the fun and we had the fun.
Anyway, that it got that serious with pignation was never the intention.
Hugo why explain? they tagged up syn and syn are the enemy i wanted to drop them in teh first place but of course u being the understanding leader that u are you told us to wait for them to flag on us. And thats what exactly happened.
Is it me? or syn reps like masterofkittens complaining and moaning on why the server is after them but they are the ones that stated they wanted the server after them. You got what you wanted so stop whining.
That siege was between who support/depend on eula violators and those who are against it.
EA was against botting, and that was Beliars signature, Kamisama however is a whole another story.
Now this is going to get pretty interesing. Synergy can only recruit from a selected pool of players, so thats their limitation, equipement and lvls arent, whereas the other side is exactly the opposite.
Anyone taking betts when MagicSword will openly support Synergy in combat?
That siege was between who support/depend on eula violators and those who are against it.
EA was against botting, and that was Beliars signature, Kamisama however is a whole another story.
Now this is going to get pretty interesing. Synergy can only recruit from a selected pool of players, so thats their limitation, equipement and lvls arent, whereas the other side is exactly the opposite.
Anyone taking betts when MagicSword will openly support Synergy in combat?
have fun kids
Well they support Hashlord, they support one farmer they support all the rest IMO.
That siege was between who support/depend on eula violators and those who are against it.
EA was against botting, and that was Beliars signature, Kamisama however is a whole another story.
Now this is going to get pretty interesing. Synergy can only recruit from a selected pool of players, so thats their limitation, equipement and lvls arent, whereas the other side is exactly the opposite.
Anyone taking betts when MagicSword will openly support Synergy in combat?
have fun kids
They actually requested to siege with me before! Thats a place you wont find them with us. At this point, we fight them as much as any other, so this a pretty far fetched idea.
Two peoples finding a common goal to go at is different than two peoples who dislike eachother fighting for a common cause and considering it a holy crusade. But its humor triumphs over its accomplishments. Allow me to show you curtosy of Daya: HugoBossMeaningEveryWord (http://members.shaw.ca/yizmajlowicz/Hugo.JPG). Note special emphasis on the beginning of the bottom left pic!
Gratz on digging up a conversation that is several months old! And even more gratz to you for being in the not so enviable position of living in a fantasy world where you expect people should never re-evaluate their positions or change their minds!
BudLight....for once, stop running your mouth and get the facts straight. Its funny to see how much you ppl can [censored] talk after one day of pvp, like last night you pm me and say:"ohhh...so "fetto" got enough pvp for one day eh? i guess this is what you wanted?"
Okey BudLight, let me give you the facts straight here.
When i started pignation and left Nightmare, hugo was still banned and had no motivation to move on, and didnt take care of hes alliance. I can understand that yes, but as soon i left Nightmare, he already started to get ****** off at me and my ppl, especially Lydian, me and PPC. He started to say that we are unloyal ppl ( i've been in nightmare for 1.5 years ) for leaving hes clan, wich pretty much didnt exist because he was banned. He started to say that none of us deserved the gear we are going around with ( 1.5 years of putting adena/AA/parts/mats/fulldrops into cwh), he even said on msn that he never seen me as a "friend", wich i find very dissappointing, but whatever...its in the past now.
BudLight, see here...its not Pignation who started this, its Nocturnus. We got the screens on conversations, we got the fraps that you guys attacking us FIRST, and same thing happend on siege, even hugo said on msn: "Fetto, war us then you [censored]"...even you warred first. So please, before you go to a forum like you always do, or ingame and start running your mouth, get the facts straight. Sorry man, but this is true...you talk before acting ~.~ And to the Nightmare ppl: I hope we can have a fun and clean war, friends or not...its still a game, stop taking politics soo serious.
All i know is im gonna have fun against Cecella/Deathie and especially Apoco tha beast! :) Cya on battlefield.
All i know is im gonna have fun against Cecella/Deathie and especially Apoco tha beast! :) Cya on battlefield.
Apoco for sure because he has the biggest cojones of NM. That guy not afraid to come out of town and is always one of the first ones to get his nose into PvP. Budlight, go win some more arena battles.
Im not running my mouth about anything.. and where u got from I am ****** off at Lydian I dont know... but ok.
And fetto, you still dont understand I'm not ******... I am more dissapointed that especially ppc left without saying 1 word, kind of expected him to since he seemed like a guy who would care enough to do that.
Yes I did say that on msn because I was not happy with u at the time, but I did consider you as a friend, but not my best one as you would like to say - I consider lots of people friends and still people in other clans now that I still consider friends because some people had respect enough to give me a good enough reason.
I warred you just last night after our conversation in ventrilo but I mean, you didnt drop your tag after the siege anyway. you decided to stay, you expect us to stay out of ur [censored] even tho u ally with synergy?
You are telling us not to take politics so serious while you instantly [censored] about pvping at Partisan Hideaway and at Dion...?
All I have to say for now.
And for Lydian, if you havent seen it already check your pms on [censored] =)
First. Oren and Gludio. We all signed up to attack Oren, and Republic signed up their alt clan to attack Gludio, because we had no idea what to expect at Oren when the decision was made. As it turns out, neither castle was defended, well there were like 2 people out gludio, but 2 peeps and a bunch of NPC's isn't gonna hold any castle. LOL
So.. we were in the throne room at Oren precisely 7 minutes after the siege started, and that included having to run from IT. Gludio went down because there were about 100 bored people at Oren and someone looked in the crystal and went "Hey there's no one defending Gludio."
So it ain't like we steamrolled a bunch of clans to take those two castles. In fact, the only PvP of the night was vs COW at the Oren gate. FTR, CoW was on the attackers list, and the PvP was pretty much just for the fun of it.
Dion was just funny. The number of PM's I got "Yo Bigs, we want to kick Synergy's ***, you care if we come.." had me literally laughing. I had no idea you guys had ****** off so many people. It got to the point about 30 or 40 min into the siege that I ended up telling my guys, "Ok, listen up, don't kill anyone but Syn and Kewlaid, everyone else is either with us, or just against them."
So ya'll can only blame one person for the force that showed up to attack you at Dion, and that is yourselves.
there is a difference between whinning and stating a fact.....saying synergy got zerged at dion is a fact...nobody is complaining. If anything....all we are saying is how pathetic it is that clans who pretty much dont like each other will still band together and call peace to take down a stronger (much smaller) force. Dion would of been a much better siege, if all those alliances that could careless for each other fought each other. thats the only flame going around. Synergy lose or win, fight as an individual, how many other alliances can say that.
Well, we came for the fun and we did have a great time, im sure synergy did aswell that it got that serious with pignation was never the idea
i had a lot of FUN! thats not the point of my sentences.
to pignation ... mmmh they are good friends and like the style we play ... i think! i dont talk to many ppl atm because of time--
so why dont help them? especially against 18 clans if they had only themselves :)
here what my intention with the post was:
it was 4 clans vs 18 clans. maybe not same lvl/equip/skilled whatever! i dont care but i think it could have been fair especially because synergy went dusk and couldnt spawn in castle anyway ~~
the point is: the great pvp we had NM vs Syn (even numbers i would say) was cool / nice / awesome / ...
BUT that was not my intention to come there you know?
i wanted to play castle-defense after a long time because i rarely had the pleasure in the last ~6 month.
and that was destroyed by NM because they wanted pvp.
there is nothing against such mass pvp but why to exact that time?
why not an other day?
you know we didnt even see the castle after the first 5 minutes.
and so my aim of "castle-defense" wasnt reached. so i was a bit
upset but this mood was gone away because of the great pvp!
sum-it-up:
nice fight
who cares politics?
maybe next time somewhere else :P
Whatever side NM is sieging against of course! Now Bighands will say this is not true, infact he will be right that it is not entirely true but if you look at HG's past participation in sieges it has been more often on the same side as NM then not. :D
Two peoples finding a common goal to go at is different than two peoples who dislike eachother fighting for a common cause and considering it a holy crusade. But its humor triumphs over its accomplishments. Allow me to show you curtosy of Daya: HugoBossMeaningEveryWord (http://members.shaw.ca/yizmajlowicz/Hugo.JPG). Note special emphasis on the beginning of the bottom left pic!
Gratz on digging up a conversation that is several months old! And even more gratz to you for being in the not so enviable position of living in a fantasy world where you expect people should never re-evaluate their positions or change their minds!
Carry on.
Daya
You told me NM was evil! Then youre trying to help liberate the castles from the people that seem to own most of them now, now you have to knock us off first. You change colors every season. And that conversation doesnt make much difference if it was yesterday or months ago, especially when we know how they feel about eachother. I like the pics on your FTP though! :eek: 1) You are bad with photoshop 2) youre better than I am with photoshop 3) Youre a hawt milf!
Dion was a good seige, republic and friendly allies (as well as a few general PvP clans) held good ground and fended off the defenders at key points during the battle. Surprised we got the doors down so fast though o.O
GF Synergy, see you guys/gals at the next seige ok?
Whatever side NM is sieging against of course! Now Bighands will say this is not true, infact he will be right that it is not entirely true but if you look at HG's past participation in sieges it has been more often on the same side as NM then not. :D
Ask Solidarity/Invictus how many times we attacked them at Innandril.
In fact, last weekend was the first time I've been on the same siege field as NM in.. umm.. 6 months? As I recall the last time we were on the field with them was when they took Aden back from Synergy.
I think I do see a common them though, most of the time when Synergy is fighting, NM shows up. The question you have to ask yourself now is, did NM show up to help us, or to hurt you.
Bah.. wait a sec.. let me see if I can make it simpler for the slow people out there.
NM has been palling around quite a bit with SOS and CarpeDiem. (they did do antharas together not so long ago.) While it may or may not be a formal alliance, all 3 of those alliances definitely have something in common. Their dislike for Synergy.
Then we have us. Republic/Requiem/GG. NEWSFLASH. The 3 of us have been sieging and raiding together for what, oh 3 months now. We have made no secret of our friendship. Typically we don't PvP together or get involved in each other's wars, although TBH it depends who we are fighting. ie: Requiem was at war with CD for a while, but you didn't see GG or Rep there getting involved.
Synergy/Pignation - You guys have been palling around lately, just like us. Maybe mix in a little LCN and some Barely Legal peridoically.
Then there's some other alliances that are currently flying under the radar. I am going to assume that it is by their choice, so I'm not going to "out" them right now, let's just say they are doing their thing.
So we have 3 major sides that are involved in sieging right now. Of those 3 sides, who does Synergy have wars against right now.
Wait, wait, that still isn't simple enough for some of you.
If we have 3 major sieging forces, and one of those 3 sieging forces ****** off the other 2, what will happen?
You can try to spin it any way you want, but that's what it boils down too.
Synergy/Pignation took Dion from Rep/Req/GG. We showed up to get it back. Then all of the clans you have been warring and in general being [censored] too, showed up to kill you. I don't think I can explain it any more simple than that.
Wasnt your fault Bigs, or any of you guys. And it wasnt really NM and companies fault for 'ruining' anything. Some people may have wanted one thing but got another, but thats life! And that was just how sieging goes.
It's the difficulty in 3 sieging sides. If one side really ****** off the other 2, you can end up in a tight spot.
Oh and just one other little thing.
Doesn't it just suck when you're trying to have a friendly little, fairly even siege, and a bunch of ******* who weren't signed up show up "for a little PvP?"
Welcome to my world, it's something I've been enjoying for about 8 months now. LOL
Don't get all defensive on my Bighands, what I stated was true. You sieged against Malevolence atleast twice with NM, this siege and a couple others if my memory servers me right. I dun care at all about it but if you take your clans Seige History in total there is a fair percentage of sieging with NM and probably zero sieging against. Ofcourse your not supposed to siege against your friends and do whats best for your clans interest. It was just an obversation from my point of view, not an attack.
I understand what your saying Lick, i do, but if your looking at our total Siege History, as you say, participation in NM involved sieges is less then 10%, which is hardly a majority. Besides that, the discussion were having involves 1 disbanded clan, and 1 who's strength has been cut in half due to recent changes. I hardly think its a relevant conversation piece anymore.
Its been said before, but if M ever asked us to participate in a defense back in those days, we would have happily accepted for a chance at the experiance.
What we are doing now, is always going to be for the benifit of GG, Req, or Rep. No one else. If something changes, you can bet we wont be afraid to state it openly. We've never felt the need to hide any of our associations in the past. Were not going to start doing it now.
svmsung built us weak doors, they were supposed to be impenetrable!!!
When you tell everyone that No means Yes, how can you expect to not get penetrated from the front or from behind?
The thing I don't understand is if you say you are a clan or alliance that wants to war everyone on the server, then why are you acting so surprised when everyone showed up to war you? You come onto the boards screaming ZERG!!!, wondering how you could ever back up what you started in the first place. If you think that warring just about every alliance on the server would end up with each alliance coming after you one at a time, then I would seriously consider immediate medical attention for that large bump on your head.
The Republic, GG and Requiem were there to take back a castle we lost 2 weeks ago. Everyone else that showed up, from what I have been reading were there to kill Synergy.
Just stop all the complaining about Zerg this and Zerg that, your starting to sound like a 50 year old housewife. Truth be told, you brought it on yourselves. My personal thought, if you wanted to war everyone on the server then yesterday's seige should have given you everything you wanted in that aspect and you really don't have anything to complain about. Now just go back down to Dark Omens and sit afk until you have come up with a strategy that might accually work against the rest of the server. Oh and stay off the boards if your the only one that thinks what you say makes since.
To the Republic, GG, and Requiem - Gratz on a great seige weekend!!! Can't wait to stand next to you guys in 2 weeks and do it all over again.
Oh no, I can't use my castle soe to go back to town any more. WTB regular soe cheap!!!
I have little to no interest in sieges anymore due to the fact mainly they occur when I am spending time with my family. I could care less tbh who owns what castle or other matters relating to them. I just get most my info from reading boards and talking to people in vent then I just throw in my 2 cents. Sometimes its just to start up some interesting debating in an otherwise stale forums as of late.
svmsung built us weak doors, they were supposed to be impenetrable!!!
When you tell everyone that No means Yes, how can you expect to not get penetrated from the front or from behind?
The thing I don't understand is if you say you are a clan or alliance that wants to war everyone on the server, then why are you acting so surprised when everyone showed up to war you? You come onto the boards screaming ZERG!!!, wondering how you could ever back up what you started in the first place. If you think that warring just about every alliance on the server would end up with each alliance coming after you one at a time, then I would seriously consider immediate medical attention for that large bump on your head.
The Republic, GG and Requiem were there to take back a castle we lost 2 weeks ago. Everyone else that showed up, from what I have been reading were there to kill Synergy.
Just stop all the complaining about Zerg this and Zerg that, your starting to sound like a 50 year old housewife. Truth be told, you brought it on yourselves. My personal thought, if you wanted to war everyone on the server then yesterday's seige should have given you everything you wanted in that aspect and you really don't have anything to complain about. Now just go back down to Dark Omens and sit afk until you have come up with a strategy that might accually work against the rest of the server. Oh and stay off the boards if your the only one that thinks what you say makes since.
To the Republic, GG, and Requiem - Gratz on a great seige weekend!!! Can't wait to stand next to you guys in 2 weeks and do it all over again.
Oh no, I can't use my castle soe to go back to town any more. WTB regular soe cheap!!!
Just stop all the complaining about Zerg this and Zerg that, your starting to sound like a 50 year old housewife. Truth be told, you brought it on yourselves. My personal thought, if you wanted to war everyone on the server then yesterday's seige should have given you everything you wanted in that aspect and you really don't have anything to complain about. Now just go back down to Dark Omens and sit afk until you have come up with a strategy that might accually work against the rest of the server. Oh and stay off the boards if your the only one that thinks what you say makes since.
LOL!! geez...suddenly this guy has a lot to say now that he OWNS A CASTLE! You're Tuff stuff...clearly.
EDIT: I had to put more detailing on the word "Tuff"
I call everyone fool, take it personally or w/e I dun care. You are the one limiting HG seige history to recent times. I on the other hand would rather look at their total history.
I call everyone fool, take it personally or w/e I dun care. You are the one limiting HG seige history to recent times. I on the other hand would rather look at their total history.
Lickn has a point here actually...look back to a while ago, you basically had the same forces but we'ren't able to conquer a wet paper bag...
LOL It took us 6 months to get to the point where we are now, gear and level wise. "Much <3" asside, we worked our ***'s off to be in the position we are now. Same thing with Req. and Republic.
HG had to earn that castle through 3 siege periods of fighting and dieing, along side our Rep. brothers. The 2 before that were given the castle, so i dont want to hear it.
Republic and Requiem weren't around back in the day, so they weren't there for us to side with.
We did siege along side Camelot/CruentoMortis many times though. (sorry guys forgot the alliance name..) In fact, we've attacked alongside them more than anyone else. (all those *** whoopings we took at Innandril vs Solidarity/Invictus/Heavens)
LOL It took us 6 months to get to the point where we are now, gear and level wise. "Much <3" asside, we worked our ***'s off to be in the position we are now. Same thing with Req. and Republic.
HG had to earn that castle through 3 siege periods of fighting and dieing, along side our Rep. brothers. The 2 before that were given the castle, so i dont want to hear it.
ROFL.. the period before we got Innandril, the average XP loss for GG was 35-40%.. that was a painfull siege right there.
Just stop all the complaining about Zerg this and Zerg that, your starting to sound like a 50 year old housewife. Truth be told, you brought it on yourselves. My personal thought, if you wanted to war everyone on the server then yesterday's seige should have given you everything you wanted in that aspect and you really don't have anything to complain about. Now just go back down to Dark Omens and sit afk until you have come up with a strategy that might accually work against the rest of the server. Oh and stay off the boards if your the only one that thinks what you say makes since.
LOL!! geez...suddenly this guy has a lot to say now that he OWNS A CASTLE! You're Tuff stuff...clearly.
EDIT: I had to put more detailing on the word "Tuff"
His alliance has owned a castle for a long time, you seem to have no idea what you are talking about.
I call everyone fool, take it personally or w/e I dun care. You are the one limiting HG seige history to recent times. I on the other hand would rather look at their total history.
I call everyone fool, take it personally or w/e I dun care. You are the one limiting HG seige history to recent times. I on the other hand would rather look at their total history.
Lickn has a point here actually...look back to a while ago, you basically had the same forces but we'ren't able to conquer a wet paper bag...
Much <3 though
Again you are talking out of your ***, NM hasnt been at one of our sieges in a long long time.
Seems to me we can add your name to the uninformed whiners all of a sudden. Keep making things up as you go along.
Havent really paid attention to politics of late, but was watchign teh Dion siege from a character i luckily left in game, and i saw ... WLE, NM, SOS, HG and Republic on the same field, but i thought NM and Republic hated SOS, along with HG, or at least thats what i gathered from teh flame fests over the forums, im just a bit lost atm :confused:
I didnt really read much of the thread but i agree jiggies. The server is more 2 sided now than it has been in a long time. Synergy claimed to bring more sides to the server and well... they did for a while but their own actions have made it two sided.
Kinda weird to see so many sides to call a truce till synergy is done or surrenders or w/e is supposed to happen to them. Honestly, you're making them stronger by doing this imo. I mean they aren't fighting anyone new... just now they can strut around saying "oh look, they had to band together to kill us LOLLERCAKES". Truth or not, they are going to say it. Ego boost +++
atm I think it is Synergy vs CarpeDiem, NM, SoS, WLE (last i knew they were warring pignation, if this has changed then correct me).
Before it was Synergy vs CarpeDiem NM SoS
SoS vs NM GG and Republic
NM vs Synergy and SoS
Repbulic and GG vs SoS
and im probably missing more... I thought it was better that way then it is now. Politics suck~
Note: I'm not trying to make anyone look like the good guy or bad guy just stating what I have seen.
Look woman, stop talking back and get in the kitchen! There was no hate meant in my previous statement. Just telling it like it is.
You guys say I am a tough guy but no no no, you guys are the tough ones. You want to war the entire server, that sounds pretty tough to me. Gosh, you are like Superman and I am a mere civilian bystander. I marvel at your presents and try my best to follow in your gigantic footsteps. I always wondered why I got this funny feeling in the pit of my belly when you were around, thinking it was because I was in the presence of god-like figures. Sorry to say, I awoke from this dream realizing that this is just a game and you guys are just 20 something people with 12 year old mentalities. Oh and that funny feeling in my belly, just constipation from the BS you are feeding everyone.
LOL!! geez...suddenly this guy has a lot to say now that he OWNS A CASTLE! You're Tuff stuff...clearly.
Step away from the keyboard and never ever ever touch it again. I think that is the stupidest thing you have ever said. You should just stop talking, it is just embarrassing. Sad really.
Quick shout out to SirJiggles or JiggieJr or SirAFK24/7 or what ever they call you these days. How have you been man? Long time no see. Shout in game sometime, we can E-sex and you can bring the little misses with you, like old times.
What I love about this is that Pignation was a clan of 15 peps at max i believe. They had a castle and would like to keep it. Im sure when they saw that 10+ clan were signed up to attack, they knew for diamn sure that 15 people coudlnt hold it.
So you think, being the amazing genious power they are, might have pulled in help to defend. I mean, who would'nt ask for some help to defend against 10+clans.
For people who like to go to seiges for PvP fun, why not grow some grapes and look for it outside of seige weekend. Pignation was samll, needed help, So synergy being as they dont have a castle im sure said, hey why not, they are the ones being attacked by a bunch of clans.
Not sure why even argue about it, people are gonna do what they have to do to win, wether it hold back a war for mutual earnings, or step onto a seige field so precious xp is minimal loss compared to growing some graps and doing it off the seige field.
We dont claim to be supermen warring the entire server. We are open to fighting with everyone, and if we lost on all or most fronts, we wouldnt be much to talk about. The only idea you have of us is the one you create and interpret from others, so please dont claim to know what were about. You never woke from any dream, you just drifted into another one. :(
i must have missed the 2 in the middle Oo
when did that happen? a bit ago i think but now they seems to be good friends ... because they have same aims ... but yes i think we have to be blamed that they went that way ...
and WLE?
would be nice to have them on war list just to have more different ppl to fight with but i wont HUNT them ... because i rarely know them ~~
in your list SoS has more pvp enemies than synergy has.
thats really interesting :)
never saw that before!
tyvm gregus!
mmmh and why isnt it just
everyone vs everyone?
i mean all mentioned allies are strong enough on their own ~~
We dont claim to be supermen warring the entire server. We are open to fighting with everyone, and if we lost on all or most fronts, we wouldnt be much to talk about. The only idea you have of us is the one you create and interpret from others, so please dont claim to know what were about. You never woke from any dream, you just drifted into another one. :(
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OMG you are funny. So freaking funny. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA just to funny. Wait let me reread your post...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA way to funny...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Oh God I just crapped my pants...
Two peoples finding a common goal to go at is different than two peoples who dislike eachother fighting for a common cause and considering it a holy crusade. But its humor triumphs over its accomplishments. Allow me to show you curtosy of Daya: HugoBossMeaningEveryWord (http://members.shaw.ca/yizmajlowicz/Hugo.JPG). Note special emphasis on the beginning of the bottom left pic!
Gratz on digging up a conversation that is several months old! And even more gratz to you for being in the not so enviable position of living in a fantasy world where you expect people should never re-evaluate their positions or change their minds!
Carry on.
Daya
You told me NM was evil! Then youre trying to help liberate the castles from the people that seem to own most of them now, now you have to knock us off first. You change colors every season. And that conversation doesnt make much difference if it was yesterday or months ago, especially when we know how they feel about eachother. I like the pics on your FTP though! :eek: 1) You are bad with photoshop 2) youre better than I am with photoshop 3) Youre a hawt milf!
Lol, enjoy!
Anyway, you say that I "change colors every season." Wrong. Me and mine had been anti NM for the past year and a half. So instead of tossing off a random incorrect statement about my political stance, why don't you simply ask me why?
But you already know why, don't you? Your just simply not going to fess up to it.
my 2 cents on all these BS l2 drama is that none of the allience out tehre will be able to fight without getting help from other allience, is sad seeing NM sorry svp/parabellum defending aden with 3 more alliences when i used to remember the old nm fighting against 2-3 alliences(synerrgy,sos and LCN) i still remeber that giran siege on december when EVERYONE in nm was there, even dou we lost that castle hugo manage to maintain giran to the end. synergy has now 4 clans and i know we can fight any allience out tehre in gustin 1v1 and give them a good fight, but when u have 4 alliences and half the clans in gustin fighting 1 allience is sad and we just laugh at wat people called zerg cause ur not using ur real potential of ur allience ur just getting help from others.
my 2 cents on all these BS l2 drama is that none of the allience out tehre will be able to fight without getting help from other allience, is sad seeing NM sorry svp/parabellum defending aden with 3 more alliences when i used to remember the old nm fighting against 2-3 alliences(synerrgy,sos and LCN) i still remeber that giran siege on december when EVERYONE in nm was there, even dou we lost that castle hugo manage to maintain giran to the end. synergy has now 4 clans and i know we can fight any allience out tehre in gustin 1v1 and give them a good fight, but when u have 4 alliences and half the clans in gustin fighting 1 allience is sad and we just laugh at wat people called zerg cause ur not using ur real potential of ur allience ur just getting help from others.
Very well said. I guees the point from synergy's perspective is that these other alliances could defend themselves without anyone else assistance. Also, stop using excuses that we are there to fight eula violators, your own clans and ppl within them buy adena all the time. GG kromay.
It is ok for synergy to recruit any known botted, pled character and any of those botted NM sidehopping sell-outs but it is not ok for other clans and alliances to put differences aside even if its only temporary. All the alliances that fight synergy have kept their own identity and handle their pvp affairs without having to rely on each other. They haven't been absorbed by each other alliances and their not even formally allied by anything other than word of mouth. When peekay or pigation get killed who comes to their help? Nicoleen, Loychar, Kamisama, ragge, etc... They rely on each other for pvp and they cry when others stop fighting each other? It hurts synergy to know that some of those alliances are not distracted wasting each other's MP in against themselfs and instead we are saving it for Syn, Lightsword and any other farmer entity that ruins the game for any legitimate player. That is a lot more than I can say for pignation and the rest of the clans in Synergy. You act as if everyone should respect synergy's ability to pvp when the only thing that you can be impressed with is the lv 78 buffs that the bots purchased from hashlord provide. Had you win this siege you would probably see pktshu talking [censored] about how you and your bots are better than everyone else in the server lol.
I'm still not getting the confusion.. When you signed up to defend did you not realize who might show up to attack you?
HELLO!!!!
Ok lemme break it down again:
Rep/Req/GG - You kicked our [censored] straight up and took the castle. We wanted a rematch.
SOS/NM/CarpeDiem & Everyone else who was there: YOU ARE AT WAR WITH THEM!!! In addition, no one was attacking any of their castles...
If you're gonna pick a fight with half the server, don't act surprised when they show up to attack your castle, or to assist the people who are attacking.
I realize that a little political spin is always fun, but you really have to be careful with it otherwise you just make yourself look stupid. A statment like:
Req/Repub/GG/NM/SOS/CD are banding together to kill Synergy, based on a single castle siege, is just stupid.
**Edit** The first rule of sieging - Don't attack the other attackers until the enemy threat has been eliminated, and there is a need to determine which attacker will be taking the castle. So why on earth would we have attacked anyone else there as long as we were all attacking the defenders. That would qualify as a really stupid strategic decision IMO.
It is ok for synergy to recruit any known botted, pled character and any of those botted NM sidehopping sell-outs but it is not ok for other clans and alliances to put differences aside even if its only temporary. All the alliances that fight synergy have kept their own identity and handle their pvp affairs without having to rely on each other. When peekay or pigation get killed who comes to their help? Nicoleen, Loychar, Kamisama, ragge, etc... They rely on each other for pvp and they cry when others stop fighting each other? It hurts synergy to know that some of those alliances are not distracted wasting each other's MP in against themselfs and instead we are saving it for Syn, Lightsword and any other farmer entity that ruins the game for any legitimate player. That is a lot more than I can say for pignation and the rest of the clans in Synergy. You act as if everyone should respect synergy's ability to pvp when the only thing that you can be impressed with is the lv 78 buffs that the bots purchased from hashlord provide. Had you win this siege you would probably see pktshu talking [censored] about how you and your bots are better than everyone else in the server lol.
clearly g4 ur the only one that brags about synergy 2- 78 toon bla bla bla, when im not saying synergy should get respect and not anyone in pignation is botted just so u know. u brag about everyone been a botter, i know u used walker cuase zillyelf has a frap of that when u were doing it in AL, and i know a few people in nM pays kami to get PL. 1 of them bought an acct and few people in gustin ebay they reason is "gg why wasting money on drugs or alcohol when i can use it on something i like". ur own allience cant even siege by themselves cuase ur a moron of a leader. For ur information all the pople that left NM the ones u call sell outs,iono,theseus and company u know why they left cause of eryan shes the reason NM hardcore clan disintegrate.
clearly g4 ur the only one that brags about synergy 2- 78 toon bla bla bla, when im not saying synergy should get respect and not anyone in pignation is botted just so u know. u brag about everyone been a botter, i know u used walker cuase zillyelf has a frap of that when u were doing it in AL, and i know a few people in nM pays kami to get PL. 1 of them bought an acct and few people in gustin ebay they reason is "gg why wasting money on drugs or alcohol when i can use it on something i like". ur own allience cant even siege by themselves cuase ur a moron of a leader. For ur information all the pople that left NM the ones u call sell outs,iono,theseus and company u know why they left cause of eryan shes the reason NM hardcore clan disintegrate.
ROFL! Are you the spokesman for iono? Tell him to choose someone less ignorant next time. All those pigs bot including Candiria, Soulavenger, Peppe(Banned)/Devy, Lydian, Zybella, etc... Anyone that isn't sucking up to synergy would confirm it if they didn't care for their friendship. Zillyelf has a fraps of me? If such thing existed it would have been all over this boards decades ago. iono/theseus and the rest of the sellouts from NM that join syn are the most hardcore botters in this server. Think about it. They have always been the only ones that match Oz in lvls and it doesn't require any hard work for them all they do is switch to the winning-side and bot in wherever place is safe for them to do so in the moment. They botted in AL, they botted in Disciples and a lot of ppl saw them other than myself. Perhaps not everyone has had the opportunity to see them in action but I know a lot have even if they admit it or not. Theseus has forcelogged 7 characters in front of me simultaniously after being in combat mode so unless you are them **** and let the tools defend themselfs. As I said less than a month into Pignation being created they are alredy in synergy alliance when they used to be in Nightmare so if anyone should be laughing here is us at you.
Hello Abyssoverlord!
Unlike Nicoleen, loychar, lordouri he wasn't purchased. He willingly wanted to be part of an alliance that fought synergy and we gave him the opportunity. Unlike synergy we aren't in debt to farmers for for his character because unlike Kamisama we didn't bought it therefor if you thought that you would be the only alliance abusing lv 78 buffs on lower lvl ppl then guess again you stupid beotch. Unlike synergy we don't openly recruit botters and pled characters and/or encourage bot trains for farming to make money so just because we made this one exception with AO you shouldn't use it to cry FOUL. Oh and a pair of legitimate bds are right around the corner to match loychar's lvl. Im curious to see how tough you are when your getting a taste of your own medicine.