Im just wondering how Hugo manages to keep people from sieging the to must profetable castles. I mean, I know NM can be powerful, but why are big alliances like republic and carpidiem ok with keeping such small castles. These alliances can easily take one of those castles. Yet they stick with the little castles because they can get alittle help from NM as long as NM can keep the big castles? NM has had control over Aden and Giran for....god I can count the months/years. I love how people can say clans fly under the rdar, yet someone Hugo has made it acceptable for NM to be the over all King of Gustin.
Makes me laugh you guys let him minipulate you guys. Dont get me wrong, I love the 200+ people showing up to take Dion castle and gludio, but battles like that really should be faught at aden and giran. Some of these allies need to grow some grapes.
Server would be alot more fun if everyones pockets werent open to hugos fondaling fingers
Well CD didn't siege dion last weekend, it was just a bunch there and they were there because of syn.
I seriously doubt that the attacking side needed CD or NM to help them since they were quite a bunch of ppl :)
Im just wondering how Hugo manages to keep people from sieging the to must profetable castles. I mean, I know NM can be powerful, but why are big alliances like republic and carpidiem ok with keeping such small castles. These alliances can easily take one of those castles. Yet they stick with the little castles because they can get alittle help from NM as long as NM can keep the big castles? NM has had control over Aden and Giran for....god I can count the months/years. I love how people can say clans fly under the rdar, yet someone Hugo has made it acceptable for NM to be the over all King of Gustin.
Makes me laugh you guys let him minipulate you guys. Dont get me wrong, I love the 200+ people showing up to take Dion castle and gludio, but battles like that really should be faught at aden and giran. Some of these allies need to grow some grapes.
Server would be alot more fun if everyones pockets werent open to hugos fondaling fingers
Goddard is small? EH? NM did lose Giran for a short time. And, at the moment there is one common enemy that most of the server has, Synergy. Is this how Syn wanted it? I dunno but they certainly griefed and warred enough to push people into it! Biting off more than they can chew? No, probably not, they're persistant and good at what they do. Maybe CD and Republic could have a fun time sieging each other or having an impersonal war between the alliances. I think the last agreed to skill based war and not hatred based war was Koga and GG...months ago. Ganking is not a [censored] war imo! And CD isn't 150+ I've never seen over 100 on at any time. It's kind of a circle, wherever Syn goes, NM goes and CD tries to go, and Vice Versa. There has really stopped being any fair fighting on this server. Bums me out. A warlord gets no love in gank wars!
the question remains, why is this server always so two sided. Everyone has established they hate synergy, thats fine. But the rest of you all hold each others hands and pat each other on the back for a job well done. ITs highly unlikely if just one alliance started to siege aden that anything would change. But if everyone on this server stopped being so **** carebear, maybe something would happen. someone please tell me why you cant have a siege with multiple eniemes. Dion is a perfect example. You guys hold each others hands just to say HEY at least we [censored] over synergy. Congratz you beat 45 people with about 300 that dislike each other. Why is this server so god **** scared of KOS! KOS is so c1. GET OVER IT. In c1 you had to worry about perma reds. PERMA REDS ARENT SCARY ANYMORE, infact they are almost never used. KOS was scary when there were 2 places to hunt, you always knew where your enemy was. So yes KOS meant, man i cant hunt. But there a billion places to hunt now. There is no excuse why this server doesnt have more then 2 sides. Im not saying everyone has to fight everyone, but grow some balls and lets have a siege where you have more then one enemy.
Im just wondering how Hugo manages to keep people from sieging the to must profetable castles. I mean, I know NM can be powerful, but why are big alliances like republic and carpidiem ok with keeping such small castles.
Its simple.
com·pla·cen·cy ( P ) Pronunciation Key (km-plsn-s)
n.
A feeling of contentment or self-satisfaction, especially when coupled with an unawareness of danger, trouble, or controversy.
An instance of contented self-satisfaction.
The other alliances are content with getting the leftovers. Hugo throws them a bone and they roll over. Woof Woof!
com·pla·cen·cy ( P ) Pronunciation Key (km-plsn-s)
n.
A feeling of contentment or self-satisfaction, especially when coupled with an unawareness of danger, trouble, or controversy.
An instance of contented self-satisfaction.
The other alliances are content with getting the leftovers. Hugo throws them a bone and they roll over. Woof Woof!
why should they fight each other ?
to make it easier for Syn to grief/gank ?
it just shows that no1 likes what they do... since chronicles in diffrent names (still same ppl).
it just makes me laugh evrytime i see one Syn's "pvp" *cough* videos ... gankin lowbies 9:1
do we all need to leech in catas before we sooo strong ?
sry , but not much ppl will miss this "players"....
the most ppl not top geared, lvld to max ..and still working hard for that, so stop whining when this "lowbies" pwn u back to ur af spots and dont eat eachother ^^
Only thing you're going to see me whine about is your horrible typing and grammar skills.
/agreed
Btw the whole cheating to be at the top of the lvl/gear list, hate to break it to you Johnnyboy but other clans (As in ones NOT in Synergy alliance) are JUST as guilty. Just few people have the guts to admit to it.
Well the "2-sideiness" has syn brought on themselves, if you declare war on half theserver and gank everyone you see (almost), you will raise some bad blood. That doesn't take a einstein to figure out...
I find it funny when people post that we really didn't expect to make the amount of enemies we have now. We don't complain about it so you can all stop patting yourself on the back about it. We just find it amusing that other alliances kiss and make up to band TOGETHER to get rid of the evil Synergy. Hats off to us!
Nah, it couldn't be the fact that some alliances dont want to deal with the political BS that comes with owning Aden or Giran lol. Everyone and there mother wants those castles, doesnt matter who owns it. Problem is that the next siege period Syn,LCN,NM and who-ever else bombards the crap out of it. I think were pretty happy with our beach front property for the time being, thx.
Well the "2-sideiness" has syn brought on themselves, if you declare war on half theserver and gank everyone you see (almost), you will raise some bad blood. That doesn't take a einstein to figure out...
there is no problem for us to have half or whole server on warlist ...
but that has nothing to do with 2-sided ....
all those clans/allies which declared war on us have no one else
on war list then us! and that isnt normal for PvP-players ... like
for example NM wants to be! sure they are cool and good pvp'ers
but have always the same known enemy ...
i had that all the time:
ea vs vvv
ea vs aea (whole server)
ea vs nm
syn vs nm
syn vs nm cd sos etc
what ppl talking about is not that we have probs with too many enemies ...
so syn made the first step to put up at least an other side then
the attacker-force of dion. you know what would have happend
if syn werent there? we had CAREBEAR TEON and 1 BIG ALLY
and that is what syn doesnt want ... even if they always have to fight a zerg*10.
if you dont understand this there are only 2 possiblites
1. my basic english sux
2. you are pve lover
Nah, it couldn't be the fact that some alliances dont want to deal with the political BS that comes with owning Aden or Giran lol. Everyone and there mother wants those castles, doesnt matter who owns it. Problem is that the next siege period Syn,LCN,NM and who-ever else bombards the crap out of it. I think were pretty happy with our beach front property for the time being, thx.
I see we are now resorting to trying to bully other clans into doing what you like by calling us carebear.....wow, never seen that one coming.
Come on, everyones doing it...
What is stopping Synergy from attacking Godard/Aden or Giran?
Perhaps the same thing that is stopping you is stopping us.
FTR, How many times has Synergy sieged Giran or Aden in the past 3 months. ROFL.. ONCE, or was it twice????
Who's the carebear?
We've been in quite a few sieges either attacking or defending over the past 3 months. For some reason Synergy almost never signs up to siege, they don't do anything but show up to gank a few people and disrupt sieges.
Maybe I'm confused on the definition of carebear, but umm.. Rep/Req/GG have signed up as a group to attack and/or defend every single siege period for at least the past 8 periods. (GG has either attacked or defended in the last 12 or 14 siege periods.. we may have missed one around X-mas time.) Where has Synergy been, what have you guys signed up to attack once and defend once in that period??
ROFL.. Who's the carebears?
Let me quote my mom on this one, "What? Is your [censored] arm broken?"
Bighands, now you're just being plain silly. If think the size of Synergy alliance is anywhere near the size of the other alliances in question that would be able to take a bigger piece of the pie then you can't see the forest for the trees friend.
Bighands, now you're just being plain silly. If think the size of Synergy alliance is anywhere near the size of the other alliances in question that would be able to take a bigger piece of the pie then you can't see the forest for the trees friend.
What does size have to do with it, ya'll are the leetest [censored]'s on the server. You clearly have the level and gear edge over every other alliance on the server.
All I'm hearing is screams of, "We want PvP!!!"
Then you don't siege.
You can't be all that weak, I mean you did take Dion, fully defended from Rep/Req/GG the period before last right???
WTH??? Is Synergy in Hugo's pocket? He paying you not to attack him maybe? bah.. I bet you are secretly on his side.. probably trying to keep us down.
I mean, [censored], you've only attacked NM once in the past 6 months.. What are you guys doing? You just want NM to hold the 2 best castles on the server?
Who you kidding? We are at war with pretty much the whole server. 30 clan war list(we would have more if it wasn't capped). How many other clans can say the same? Synergy does not have the numbers to successfully hold a castle simply because of numbers, which I am fine with. Until then I am happy with PvPing on our terms, we are pretty successful at it imo. If anyone from our side complains of zerg then shame on them because I used to laugh at all NM and company calling Malevolence zerg. Sissies! Synergy knew what it was getting into when picking fights with everyone, we aren't naive. We just chuckle at the puppet master Hugo's political ability to able to hold the 2 best money making castles (by a long shot) with the numbers he has. Props to him. I already said it, complacent. Know your roles fellas. Hoho.
I see we are now resorting to trying to bully other clans into doing what you like by calling us carebear.....wow, never seen that one coming.
Come on, everyones doing it...
What is stopping Synergy from attacking Godard/Aden or Giran?
Perhaps the same thing that is stopping you is stopping us.
FTR, How many times has Synergy sieged Giran or Aden in the past 3 months. ROFL.. ONCE, or was it twice????
Who's the carebear?
We've been in quite a few sieges either attacking or defending over the past 3 months. For some reason Synergy almost never signs up to siege, they don't do anything but show up to gank a few people and disrupt sieges.
Maybe I'm confused on the definition of carebear, but umm.. Rep/Req/GG have signed up as a group to attack and/or defend every single siege period for at least the past 8 periods. (GG has either attacked or defended in the last 12 or 14 siege periods.. we may have missed one around X-mas time.) Where has Synergy been, what have you guys signed up to attack once and defend once in that period??
ROFL.. Who's the carebears?
Let me quote my mom on this one, "What? Is your [censored] arm broken?"
She meant, get off your *** and do it yourself.
Did you really just try to say GG is less carebear than synergy? lol
Sieges happen once every 2 weeks. Pvp happens everday. Tell me how often does GG pvp?
I might consider you guys not carebears if you could successfully siege/defend a castle without 2 other massive alliances holding your hands, until then your just a bunch of carebears. Maybe you should follow your mom's advice and "do it yourself".
Edit: As for the whole "not sieging NM" thing, thats bs. Sure, many times we dont have a full on siege because we dont have nearly enough numbers and therefore cant even fight our way onto the siege field, but we still pvp against NM for the whole siege time.
Who you kidding? We are at war with pretty much the whole server. 30 clan war list(we would have more if it wasn't capped). How many other clans can say the same? Synergy does not have the numbers to successfully hold a castle simply because of numbers, which I am fine with. Until then I am happy with PvPing on our terms, we are pretty successful at it imo. If anyone from our side complains of zerg then shame on them because I used to laugh at all NM and company calling Malevolence zerg. Sissies! Synergy knew what it was getting into when picking fights with everyone, we aren't naive. We just chuckle at the puppet master Hugo's political ability to able to hold the 2 best money making castles (by a long shot) with the numbers he has. Props to him. I already said it, complacent. Know your roles fellas. Hoho.
LOL
I'm one of the "30".
So you would rather have 30 clans on your war list than oust your #1 enemy from his castles. (That he has held for freaking months..)
That makes great sense there.
Sometimes I really don't think we're playing the same game.
Let me make sure I got this right. Synergy, who is such a bunch of badasses they want to have 30 wars at once, admittedly can't take Aden or Giran, but you are trying to talk us into it instead. (after you did take our castle away the period before last)
Not only that, but your guys fill up 2 threads of crying Zerg, but then you put right in that post that you aren't naive and you knew what you were getting yourselves into.
So the point of this thread was to say, "We're strong enough to beat you, but not strong enough to take Aden/Giran, so why don't you guys get in there and get it done."
It's not complacency that's hurting us Lick. It's failure (or lack of desire) to handle politics and diplomacy.
Some people just arn't getting the sarcasm are they. It's annoying to be called something your not eh Orcish?
Edit - BTW If being carbear means having the smarts and the numbers to take 2 castles in one day with like a total of 5 casualtys, then i guess im a carebear rofl.
I see we are now resorting to trying to bully other clans into doing what you like by calling us carebear.....wow, never seen that one coming.
Come on, everyones doing it...
What is stopping Synergy from attacking Godard/Aden or Giran?
Perhaps the same thing that is stopping you is stopping us.
FTR, How many times has Synergy sieged Giran or Aden in the past 3 months. ROFL.. ONCE, or was it twice????
Who's the carebear?
We've been in quite a few sieges either attacking or defending over the past 3 months. For some reason Synergy almost never signs up to siege, they don't do anything but show up to gank a few people and disrupt sieges.
Maybe I'm confused on the definition of carebear, but umm.. Rep/Req/GG have signed up as a group to attack and/or defend every single siege period for at least the past 8 periods. (GG has either attacked or defended in the last 12 or 14 siege periods.. we may have missed one around X-mas time.) Where has Synergy been, what have you guys signed up to attack once and defend once in that period??
ROFL.. Who's the carebears?
Let me quote my mom on this one, "What? Is your [censored] arm broken?"
She meant, get off your *** and do it yourself.
Did you really just try to say GG is less carebear than synergy? lol
Sieges happen once every 2 weeks. Pvp happens everday. Tell me how often does GG pvp?
I might consider you guys not carebears if you could successfully siege/defend a castle without 2 other massive alliances holding your hands, until then your just a bunch of carebears. Maybe you should follow your mom's advice and "do it yourself".
Edit: As for the whole "not sieging NM" thing, thats bs. Sure, many times we dont have a full on siege because we dont have nearly enough numbers and therefore cant even fight our way onto the siege field, but we still pvp against NM for the whole siege time.
So then how many sieges have you signed up (and attended) in the past 6 months?
How many times have you attacked Aden/Giran?
I mean if you're going to give us a hard time about not doing it, then you prolly should be prepared to step up and show your record.
Day to day PvP is daily practice for the big game. The big game that happens every 2 weeks.
Guess what, my whole alliance doesn't have a single lvl 78 person in it. In fact, as far as I know, we only have one 76+. Now you're telling me that your alliance that fields multiple GROUPS of 76+'s, including multiple freaking HEROS isn't strong enough to take Aden and Giran, but you don't understand why we aren't getting in there and doing it.
ROFLMFAO.
If I stop by your clan hall can I get some of what you're smoking?
Last but not least.
We had the Raid Chat open at the last siege, so I know precisely how many people we had there from Rep/Req/GG.
I like to see everyone upset that GG/Rep/Req have such a good friendship.
That is what this all boils down to IMO. After all we are just a bunch of carebears that doesnt pvp at all (even the raidboss farmers) ever. And without friends we wouldnt be able to take or hold a castle.....wait a second isnt that the way the game is designed....
Pick and choose your times to call out others pot, this is black signing off.
Bighands, now you're just being plain silly. If think the size of Synergy alliance is anywhere near the size of the other alliances in question that would be able to take a bigger piece of the pie then you can't see the forest for the trees friend.
What does size have to do with it, ya'll are the leetest [censored]'s on the server. You clearly have the level and gear edge over every other alliance on the server.
All I'm hearing is screams of, "We want PvP!!!"
Then you don't siege.
You can't be all that weak, I mean you did take Dion, fully defended from Rep/Req/GG the period before last right???
WTH??? Is Synergy in Hugo's pocket? He paying you not to attack him maybe? bah.. I bet you are secretly on his side.. probably trying to keep us down.
I mean, [censored], you've only attacked NM once in the past 6 months.. What are you guys doing? You just want NM to hold the 2 best castles on the server?
you must be smarter then this. Synergy would seige every week, we dont care about facing the whole server ...the only problem is that every other alliance will hault there grudges and wars to take down synergy so why do we bother. we would siege every castle if you guys would continue on with your own politics. However there is no point in us siege giran or aden, when everyone will show up to soley kill us and let nm keep the castles. If you guys showed up and actively fought to take the castle, we be there too, to also try and take it, and maybe other alliances would to. If multiple alliances fight for it maybe somebody (probally not us) would end up with it. But you guys are to scared to kill anyone but us, cuz we made it blantely clear for everyone that we gonna kill you regardless if your carebear or not. However all these other clans are content holding each others hands while maintaining the scraps, when they have the numbers and levels to take something better.
if we really wanted giran or aden we would take in allys. and make ourselfs bigger then what we are now. We stay small to give the rest of the server a chance. But you guys are to busy holding each other hands to realise what your capable of.
nm vs sos
cd vs synergy
nm vs synergy
gg vs synergy
sos vs synergy
gg vs nm
if this all happend at one siege, it would be intresting
but when it comes to a siege
it just gustin vs synergy..
we like gustin vs snergy, but you guys need to not be content with the scraps you have. Doesnt GG want the 100 mill a week aden makes. Why not try and take it? If synergy really cared about taking the castles and pwning like you all say we would be siege with other people. But right now when are outnumber 300 to 30-40 so all we can do is gank....its up to everyone else to change that. nobody asking to stop killing us, but god ****it stop being so carebear with each other, and take something you deserve. you be surprised. If gg fought hard for aden...we be there not to help you but to kill everyone just like we always do. Who knows who would end up owning it at the end. All i know is it would be fun for all. My god if CD ever got off there ***, and faught nm and all these other alliances...this server would be intresting. HOwever you will all just continue picking up scraps and patting each other on your backs and declaring your victories of synergy. well gratz you guys are highly skilled.
You see scraps...I guess we see the better portion of ownable landscape in aden under our flags for 2 weeks. Matter of opinion I guess. I bet the farmers who actual use the manors over the next two weeks wont be complaining about us.
And another thing about us all "banding together." You guys do realize that the only reason wars were stopped, and the way this whole thing started, was to get at Lightswords throats. I doubt anyone in GG looks at Synergy and says "We have to destroy them." The fights we had were fun, and as far as i know, you've never trashed talked us. Dont start now.
It ain't Gustin vs Synergy by any means. Despite your best efforts, we hardly ever fight you, and I think last weekend was the very first time that we have actually sieged against Synergy EVER. Sure, we've dicked around with you on the field, but picking off a few peeps from the sideline doesn't really count as sieging against each other.
So what you're saying is "Synergy doesn't want to put forth the work required to take Aden/Giran, but we sure wish someone else would."
It ain't Gustin vs Synergy by any means. Despite your best efforts, we hardly ever fight you, and I think last weekend was the very first time that we have actually sieged against Synergy EVER. Sure, we've dicked around with you on the field, but picking off a few peeps from the sideline doesn't really count as sieging against each other.
So what you're saying is "Synergy doesn't want to put forth the work required to take Aden/Giran, but we sure wish someone else would."
Thanks for your support guy!
Bigs they are just ****** they cant do a **** thing about it.
It ain't Gustin vs Synergy by any means. Despite your best efforts, we hardly ever fight you, and I think last weekend was the very first time that we have actually sieged against Synergy EVER. Sure, we've dicked around with you on the field, but picking off a few peeps from the sideline doesn't really count as sieging against each other.
So what you're saying is "Synergy doesn't want to put forth the work required to take Aden/Giran, but we sure wish someone else would."
Thanks for your support guy!
Bigs they are just ****** they cant do a **** thing about it.
ROFL.. they are killing me man.
They prove they are stronger than us by taking Dion. Then they [censored] at us for not going after the 2 castles they say they are not strong enough to take.
I see what youre saying Bigs. We have signed up to attack Giran/Aden many times for quite awhile now. Since we formed in C4 (Took Goddard) weve been signed at somewhere. We were bringing 2-3 groups until Dweeb had to be a working jijio. After we lost Oz we may not have sieged for a time in there, nevertheless our guys were still going to some siege for PvP. We made to Aden to put up flags when Aden/Giran was at the same time. Still had 3 groups and change, which is a good chunk of our alliance. However, they were split with about 3x that at Aden, and more than double that at Giran. Even if were forced in at a gate, weve still been PvPing granted its possible to attack someone. But people do come that were at war with, and theres nothing wrong with that really. Honestly though NM would lose their castle without the support of these clans getting little to no benefits from those castles. If I wanted to be strategic about it, I wouldnt have let my allies go to have fun at another siege and give NM their new allies. My guys are disappointed at the attitudes of players. Some would prefer to rally allies to the point that the other person doesnt even participate in PvP, rather than fighting them and winning/losing. This was a mentality to leave fights with a 'winning spirit' in mind, but frankly its just a [censored] game, and were going to go purple to have fun.
synergy could easily bring allies to fight the zergs we face...this is the attitude of synergy, nobody wants a oneside-sided server anymore. Despite our best efforts of non-descriminating (equal opportuntunity pvpers lol) we kill everyone that will fight us...the attitude of many of the clans such as yours is....lets just fight synergy. Dont you get it, synergy wants to fight everyone but they want multiple sides. By keeping synergy small we are saying 'hey, were letting the server do there own thing', 'we could dominate and take all the castles, but it be alot more fun if other alliances stepped up.' You guys can pat yourselfs on your backs as long as you want for your many months of squabbling over [censored] castles. Dont you get it? Hugo is more then content to stay out of your business and keep you as a distant ally if you settle for scraps. Hes a smart man. This is the same thing EA did to nm for a long time. Until nm got smart and said [censored] YOU we want more...and guess what they took it. And ea is dead now. You guys have the same opportunity. Infact NM isnt even that strong right now. What makes them strong is the whole server comes running to there side cuz there only true enemy is Synergy. Even sos and nm are buddy buddy now. Frankly its pathetic. grow some balls gustin and take what you deserve. I Guarntee you, if all these sides step up...it wont be synergy holding the castles. You dont have to worry about that. Everyone in synergy has held castles through the history of l2...it doesnt tickle our fancy anymore. Big whoop you own a castle....you know what sieges are 2 days out of 2 weeks. Synergy likes pvping everyday. But since many of these clans still rely on castle sieges for pvp...why not grow some balls and take what is in the grasps of your palms.
Syn. want to have fun Fighting everyone thay can. Be it lowbie B-Grader to Hero... They stated this pretty much as what they wanted to do come C-4...
I think the reason they did this is because they want a target rich enviorment, they like to be able to port some place and see a war tag and kill them. Saves them time in the long run hunting them down, not that they are not willing to do that as well...
The thing is I really think they want people to be more like them. **** the numbers and lets go and have fun... The problem, if you want to call it that, is that now all the people that are under attack by Syn. at this one time came together to help beat up on the them...
I have to give it to Hugo, now that he is back. He has been able to keep Aden a long time and now that he has fewer numbers then before he was banned. He has now been able to get the other clans to see that the enemy of my enemy can be my friend. So he has been able to keep control of the castles he has...
Will GG/Rep/Req/CD try and take one of the big castles? Sure they will eventually, its going to happen... Or Hugo will notice that one of them is getting a little bigger then he likes and he will offer up Giran/Aden for them. This will keep them on his side and indebted to him...
I think that people are trying to point out that Numbers, not Levels or gear is the stronger option in this game. Yes Gear and levels Help, But if the Odds were 10 to 1 in your favor no alliance can stand up to that... We have seen it in the past, we see it now, and we will see the same thing in the future. atleast till everyone is in top gear and max level. Then numbers will be even a bigger factor...
So the big question is " IF " Syn. disbanded and Kamisama and all the old Bad Guys that everyone keeps saying are EA'ish Stoped playing or joined a smaller clan to just PvE... Would the current Castle owners and large Alliances be content to hold the castles they have or would they be willing to throw the dice and try taking the Big ones?
WE know NM is low on numbers and active Members now. How tempting is it to think about all that income even if it was only for 2 weeks? think of what you clan leaders could do with 200m adena and all the great stuff you could make with those castles manor systems...
Sure is something to think about...
Mark my words, Some time soon or Later Aden or Giran will fall and its only a matter of time till they do. It really just depends on who is ready to step up and try taking it...
more realistic...if you guys refuse to take more then 2 sides...it gives synergy really only one option...which they dont wanna do....either continue to be fustrated by the refusal of the server to expand past a two sided faction....or they can expand and compete with all the sides that are currently against them. It was never the idea of synergy to expand.....but the stubborness of this server is just sickenining. Nobdy saying that you have to join the gank wars with other allaiances. but god ****it dont hold each others hands at least during sieges. Every alliance should be seeking the strongest castle they can get. not settling for scraps
Ask Solidarity/Invictus how many times we attacked them at Innandril.
In fact, last weekend was the first time I've been on the same siege field as NM in.. umm.. 6 months? As I recall the last time we were on the field with them was when they took Aden back from Synergy.
I think I do see a common them though, most of the time when Synergy is fighting, NM shows up. The question you have to ask yourself now is, did NM show up to help us, or to hurt you.
Bah.. wait a sec.. let me see if I can make it simpler for the slow people out there.
NM has been palling around quite a bit with SOS and CarpeDiem. (they did do antharas together not so long ago.) While it may or may not be a formal alliance, all 3 of those alliances definitely have something in common. Their dislike for Synergy.
Then we have us. Republic/Requiem/GG. NEWSFLASH. The 3 of us have been sieging and raiding together for what, oh 3 months now. We have made no secret of our friendship. Typically we don't PvP together or get involved in each other's wars, although TBH it depends who we are fighting. ie: Requiem was at war with CD for a while, but you didn't see GG or Rep there getting involved.
Synergy/Pignation - You guys have been palling around lately, just like us. Maybe mix in a little LCN and some Barely Legal peridoically.
Then there's some other alliances that are currently flying under the radar. I am going to assume that it is by their choice, so I'm not going to "out" them right now, let's just say they are doing their thing.
So we have 3 major sides that are involved in sieging right now. Of those 3 sides, who does Synergy have wars against right now.
Wait, wait, that still isn't simple enough for some of you.
If we have 3 major sieging forces, and one of those 3 sieging forces ****** off the other 2, what will happen?
You can try to spin it any way you want, but that's what it boils down too.
Synergy/Pignation took Dion from Rep/Req/GG. We showed up to get it back. Then all of the clans you have been warring and in general being [censored] too, showed up to kill you. I don't think I can explain it any more simple than that.
The only people who think there is only two sides is you, the reason being you appear to want the whole server to be against you. The fact is, that's just not true, Rep/Req/GG have not interfered, or even attended any siege that Synergy has been signed up for until we attacked Dion this past week.
We wanted it back, no big deal, and no conspiracy plot. ;)
maybe you should stop quoting your self and start reading between the lines....you guys can stay out of nm/synergy sieges all you want...what you should be doing though is trying to get aden or giran. Why are you so afraid to get involved wtih nm/synergy...we dont have kudes... you keep saying your guys lack gear and levels....well 200 mill a week will help you with that.
more realistic...if you guys refuse to take more then 2 sides...it gives synergy really only one option...which they dont wanna do....either continue to be fustrated by the refusal of the server to expand past a two sided faction....or they can expand and compete with all the sides that are currently against them. It was never the idea of synergy to expand.....but the stubborness of this server is just sickenining. Nobdy saying that you have to join the gank wars with other allaiances. but god ****it dont hold each others hands at least during sieges. Every alliance should be seeking the strongest castle they can get. not settling for scraps
so as i understand Syn's point is
they wish to remake the server in their image and if the server does not take the path shown them by Syn may be forced to expand in order to make this sever a happy place for everyone.
And this is different from EA how?
You say that Hugo is the bad guy but he is not forcing anything on anyone that i have heard of at this time.
Everyone has their own idea on what is fun for them and they really dont need you to help them to achieve their goals.
I mean not everyone can buy clan halls for their clans at 1 billion adena each. We cant afford to get level 78 buff account handed to us. We cant afford to loose hard earned xp as easily as Syn seems to be able to.
Let the server catch up a bit and i suspect you will get the pvp you seem to think you want.
I think that you may not like it as much as you do now when you have level and gear on most of the clans you are at war with.
yes hugo is a happy pig....as long as he has giran and aden making 100-200 mill a week so he can keep his e-gf happy
why in the world would hugo want anything to change?
your still talking about catching up in levels...you people have been saying this since beta...
synergy hasnt bought 78 buff bots....oh wait that would be abyss overlord who went for roughly 1k? And he fights with you
guys. Every week you come up with more and more excuses.
Synergy doesnt regain xp easier then anyone else. Infact its harder for us to because we have enemies everywhere. keep fabricating more excuses plz? Nobody in synergy is forcing anyone. This is my own logic..i dont represent the alliance wishes. Im just saying if gustin remains so narrow minded...all thats gonna happen is one big powerful force is gonna uprise which everybody [censored] about for 3 chronicles. Synergy is trying to do the opposite by giving individual alliances a fighting chance
ROb how can u be telling other people how to play the game and yet play the game the way you want to play?
Nice try on plotting other alliances that are friends with N against N. These are the friends that helped us take down Antharas. We succeeded. Did you? No and you want to know why? Because no one else would help you. Why wouldnt they help you? You know the answer.
no i was talking about clan halls in Goddard and I am talking about clans not in NM. The same clans you wish to lead into the promised land.
Give them the same advantages as you have and you very may well get the server you wish, but till then its haves versus the have nots ( hint you are the haves )
I did not mention bought accounts, so i have no idea what you are talking about ( and obviously i am not the only one )
Some people dont have the time or friends to help us get to 78 as fast as Syn seems to have. So you can either wait and have great pvp or you can continue to gank lesser levels your choice ( and i do think you would prefer the latter to the former )
For someone not forcing your words seem to carry that tone. I will take it that english is not your primary language and that the translation software is changing the meaning of your words.
Remember it took Moses 40 years to get the choosen to the promised land and he was not able to ever cross into the promised land. I hope you have better luck than he did.
Synergy' wishes to make a multi-sided pvp server will only occur when Synergy and his great afk sitting leader purely and simply leave the game. Sorry to be rude but its the only and real truth. I guess ppl are tired to see gustin highest players being half real players half computers.
Maybe it's just me, but I see a major catch 22 here. Supposedly the Rep/Req/GG friendship is supposed to take Aden/Giran because they make great money. Ok, I can understand that to a point. Then we get people saying, "Well, Aden/Giran can help with the lack of gear." Ok, I can agree with that. But, how does a bunch of B graders (some still in C grade) go against the members of a highly established (albeit shrinking ever so slightly) alliance with full A grade and levels before they take the cash from a castle to siege that same castle?
Interesting. I think they call that, "Putting the cart before the horse." Take the castle to get cash without having cash in the first place to get the gear to take the cash to gear people up...
If the three alliances want to take those castles, I'm sure they would. Or maybe, it's that we're supposed to take the castles so someone else could come in and take them 2 weeks later. Hmm, conspiracy maybe? Nah, I don't believe it, but I thought I'd throw it out there.
Telling a few others what to do while not taking into account other factors really isn't politics at all. It's more bullying than anything. But hey, play your game and we'll play ours :)
i dont believe we asked other alliances to participate....genius budlight...i dont think nm would succeed in taking solo either. Im sure kami could recuit the necessary alliances to take it down, however im sure we will get it solo...synergy likes to operate on there own terms. Im not telling other alliances how to play...im just saying...all there asking for is a 1 -sided server again and all these people are the ones that will [censored] when that comes true. There no reason alliances cant raid together and siege against each other...(that is if you uphold your promise not to kos)
ok bannic cough kuladan...lets take it slow...find me one quote from any page where anyone in synergy asks for less pvp?
we are saying KEEP KILLING US PLZ, but stop holding each other hands...you guys dislike each other just as much as us.. so stop pretending. Why not kill all your enemies on the siege field....if all alliances were doing this or even some....sieges at aden and giran might end up in alliances such as CD or GG which have the numbers to take it.
Maybe it's just me, but I see a major catch 22 here. Supposedly the Rep/Req/GG friendship is supposed to take Aden/Giran because they make great money. Ok, I can understand that to a point. Then we get people saying, "Well, Aden/Giran can help with the lack of gear." Ok, I can agree with that. But, how does a bunch of B graders (some still in C grade) go against the members of a highly established (albeit shrinking ever so slightly) alliance with full A grade and levels before they take the cash from a castle to siege that same castle?
Interesting. I think they call that, "Putting the cart before the horse." Take the castle to get cash without having cash in the first place to get the gear to take the cash to gear people up...
If the three alliances want to take those castles, I'm sure they would. Or maybe, it's that we're supposed to take the castles so someone else could come in and take them 2 weeks later. Hmm, conspiracy maybe? Nah, I don't believe it, but I thought I'd throw it out there.
Telling a few others what to do while not taking into account other factors really isn't politics at all. It's more bullying than anything. But hey, play your game and we'll play ours :)
<3 to Gustin ;)
easy when ur not fighting just one enemy...its chaos...and anybody can end up with it. You wont just be fighting Nm or Just synergy. And synergy wont just be fighting you. You guys have more numbers the nm and synergy put together. If it was 1 vs 1 yes you might lose. However in a multi sided siege, an avg lvl 50 clan could end up with aden.
With as many enemies as we have, please kill all our afk botting players. Please. And then stop acting like theres no solution. We have war tags, Im the leader of a clan. I cant leave and powerlevel. If I powerleveled, Id have hero, and not still 76 this deep into C4. The only reason we lost Antharas is we had about a mage group and change left by the time he frenzied. A lot of people couldnt make it and lots had to go, and we dont kill really fast with so few people. The thread has good posts, but lets not argue about what happened at Dion. The attackers went there for the castle, so of course theyd stay to take and hold it. I dont think anything was 'ruined.' The only real point is theres 2 big sieging forces that seem disinterested in fighting. Synergy alone was never meant to be an alliance that can go sack castles from any force easily. In fact if we ever took them, itd be quite an acheivement. I wouldnt say the lower bracket castle owners are disinterested in siegeing the others. These things take time, and the server always changes. Would CD/Legionarry defend the other castles from GG/Requiem/republic? If not, thatd be an interesting siege.
Synergy' wishes to make a multi-sided pvp server will only occur when Synergy and his great afk sitting leader purely and simply leave the game. Sorry to be rude but its the only and real truth. I guess ppl are tired to see gustin highest players being half real players half computers.
Cmon, get real. I could say Fusion is ruining the game because theyre one of the single strongest clans on gustin and are willing to backstab their allies for anything. Or I can say they pulled some crap on my friends and I fight them for enjoyment. I grow tired of hearing what 'ruins the game.' Things that drive you to work with friends and play hard is what makes this game. These things are usually the 'bad things' that 'ruin the game.' If the game environment is ruined by mindless idiots, then it only seems sensible to find a new hobby.
the question remains, why is this server always so two sided. Everyone has established they hate synergy, thats fine. But the rest of you all hold each others hands and pat each other on the back for a job well done. ITs highly unlikely if just one alliance started to siege aden that anything would change. But if everyone on this server stopped being so **** carebear, maybe something would happen. someone please tell me why you cant have a siege with multiple eniemes. Dion is a perfect example. You guys hold each others hands just to say HEY at least we [censored] over synergy. Congratz you beat 45 people with about 300 that dislike each other. Why is this server so god **** scared of KOS! KOS is so c1. GET OVER IT. In c1 you had to worry about perma reds. PERMA REDS ARENT SCARY ANYMORE, infact they are almost never used. KOS was scary when there were 2 places to hunt, you always knew where your enemy was. So yes KOS meant, man i cant hunt. But there a billion places to hunt now. There is no excuse why this server doesnt have more then 2 sides. Im not saying everyone has to fight everyone, but grow some balls and lets have a siege where you have more then one enemy.
Wah wah we are griefers but we cant take a castle, we cant kill antharas, we cant win in open pvp against a party of elpys, we can't even make it past round 2 of a pvp tournament against people our own levels and numbers. Please please make the bad people go away ... Fight amonst yourselves for awhile. If anyone needs us we will be in dark omens "leveling" our xp back until we are ready to resume griefing you. kekeke
Bighands, now you're just being plain silly. If think the size of Synergy alliance is anywhere near the size of the other alliances in question that would be able to take a bigger piece of the pie then you can't see the forest for the trees friend.
What does size have to do with it, ya'll are the leetest [censored]'s on the server. You clearly have the level and gear edge over every other alliance on the server.
All I'm hearing is screams of, "We want PvP!!!"
Then you don't siege.
You can't be all that weak, I mean you did take Dion, fully defended from Rep/Req/GG the period before last right???
WTH??? Is Synergy in Hugo's pocket? He paying you not to attack him maybe? bah.. I bet you are secretly on his side.. probably trying to keep us down.
I mean, [censored], you've only attacked NM once in the past 6 months.. What are you guys doing? You just want NM to hold the 2 best castles on the server?
Lets start from the beginning here. We dont have a zerg alliance. WE dont have the leetest gear. We do know howto pvp. We run out of mp before taking on a mess load of people. WE are the only ones to even attack Aden/Giran. You guys claim to be seiging which is true but you could also truely pvp against Nm alone. NM isnt crap without the support they get from SW/SOS and the whole server. Also, NM would never pvp our alliance vs their alliance alone. So when you all stop hugging and kissing each other you would realise you could actually take aden for yourselves and it would truely be in the hands of a more powerful alliance.
Who you kidding? We are at war with pretty much the whole server. 30 clan war list(we would have more if it wasn't capped). How many other clans can say the same? Synergy does not have the numbers to successfully hold a castle simply because of numbers, which I am fine with. Until then I am happy with PvPing on our terms, we are pretty successful at it imo. If anyone from our side complains of zerg then shame on them because I used to laugh at all NM and company calling Malevolence zerg. Sissies! Synergy knew what it was getting into when picking fights with everyone, we aren't naive. We just chuckle at the puppet master Hugo's political ability to able to hold the 2 best money making castles (by a long shot) with the numbers he has. Props to him. I already said it, complacent. Know your roles fellas. Hoho.
LOL
I'm one of the "30".
So you would rather have 30 clans on your war list than oust your #1 enemy from his castles. (That he has held for freaking months..)
That makes great sense there.
Sometimes I really don't think we're playing the same game.
Let me make sure I got this right. Synergy, who is such a bunch of badasses they want to have 30 wars at once, admittedly can't take Aden or Giran, but you are trying to talk us into it instead. (after you did take our castle away the period before last)
Not only that, but your guys fill up 2 threads of crying Zerg, but then you put right in that post that you aren't naive and you knew what you were getting yourselves into.
So the point of this thread was to say, "We're strong enough to beat you, but not strong enough to take Aden/Giran, so why don't you guys get in there and get it done."
It's not complacency that's hurting us Lick. It's failure (or lack of desire) to handle politics and diplomacy.
Again I have to reply to another post of yours. Yes we are strong enough for NM. NM couldnt beat us alliance vs alliance at all. I think what Synergy should do is just allow you guys to hang out for a while without our interference and someone will get greedy or act like a moron and end of your friendships.
Synergy' wishes to make a multi-sided pvp server will only occur when Synergy and his great afk sitting leader purely and simply leave the game. Sorry to be rude but its the only and real truth. I guess ppl are tired to see gustin highest players being half real players half computers.
Cmon, get real. I could say Fusion is ruining the game because theyre one of the single strongest clans on gustin and are willing to backstab their allies for anything. Or I can say they pulled some crap on my friends and I fight them for enjoyment. I grow tired of hearing what 'ruins the game.' Things that drive you to work with friends and play hard is what makes this game. These things are usually the 'bad things' that 'ruin the game.' If the game environment is ruined by mindless idiots, then it only seems sensible to find a new hobby.
Did i mention Fusion in my post? And cant u see my sign? F has nothing to do with my thoughts. And if ppl ask me who i am to say state such thoughts, i wouldnt say im god like Kamisama (for those who dont know yet the guy is humble enough to call himself 'God' in japanese), but much prolly god's right hand middle finger.
Again I have to reply to another post of yours. Yes we are strong enough for NM. NM couldnt beat us alliance vs alliance at all. I think what Synergy should do is just allow you guys to hang out for a while without our interference and someone will get greedy or act like a moron and end of your friendships.
If you guys can take NM, then do it and stop telling everyone else to do it, it's almost comical at this point. The reason Rep/Req/GG are friends is because we all just have fun playing the game as it is, and have very little hatred towards anyone. I don't personally hold any grudges against anyone, and I'm sure many of these guys don't either.
I think it's been said best that your enemies enemy is your friend. When one group wars everyone else, the others are forced into this position and will take immediate action against their biggest threat, hence the ongoing MS fight. Grudges will always exist, no matter what. We're what 1-2 years out of EA and people still cry, "EA!" whenever an alliance reaches a certain size. Even in recent months people were saying M was EA, Syn was EA, and it's only a matter of time before the talk starts about someone new. Grudges can, however, be put on hold to deal with the immediate threat of a new, more threatening enemy. We were at war with SoS, now we fight alongside of them to end the RB monopoly known as MS. If/When that is complete, it may resume, it may not. We may have a new enemy to fight, we may not.
To judge any clan based on the actions it takes in a few sieges, or in any non-siege PvP that may occur is trying to pin someone in a spot that is probably not fitting for them. If someone decides to act like a moron, let them. When they see they've been detagged by force, they'll either a) understand the folly of their ways, or b) run off and do the same thing to another clan. For many siege periods I know we sieged Innadril every siege period. Some were with Rep, some with the old KoL, and some just with other's that happened to sign up that we never spoke to. I lost my fair share of % (40 some % in one siege alone, mind you) to be able to come here and tell you that we didn't ask for help from anyone, but it was offered as friendship.
Friends don't always have to look at life the exact same way you do. If it did, we all be mindless drones in giant cliques talking about the exact same things over and over again. It's the same way in this game. Just because a friendship is created doesn't mean we all agree over everything. (I'm glad I'm not privvy to any of the leadership discussions lol)
Now can't we all just get out there, and play the game we want to play it? Be it a 1-, 2-, or 3-sided server, this game is still fun to play. Remember, your enemies enemy is your friend...
Thats ALL I have gotten out of this. If certain things weren't happening I would sign up for Aden right now tbh. Looking at all those potential red defending tags O.O
nothing against NM but that PVP looks fun. Aftering being in the A-EA zerg, "Malevolence Zerg", and "Annihilation Zerg"... I'd like to be in the side with "less numbers" for once~
Hey now sometold me the dion moat was made kewlaid. So I wanted to get to it. Just so happened there was 300 people in the way. And I think we actually got killed more by synergy than you guys :)
Synergy' wishes to make a multi-sided pvp server will only occur when Synergy and his great afk sitting leader purely and simply leave the game. Sorry to be rude but its the only and real truth. I guess ppl are tired to see gustin highest players being half real players half computers.
Cmon, get real. I could say Fusion is ruining the game because theyre one of the single strongest clans on gustin and are willing to backstab their allies for anything. Or I can say they pulled some crap on my friends and I fight them for enjoyment. I grow tired of hearing what 'ruins the game.' Things that drive you to work with friends and play hard is what makes this game. These things are usually the 'bad things' that 'ruin the game.' If the game environment is ruined by mindless idiots, then it only seems sensible to find a new hobby.
Did i mention Fusion in my post? And cant u see my sign? F has nothing to do with my thoughts. And if ppl ask me who i am to say state such thoughts, i wouldnt say im god like Kamisama (for those who dont know yet the guy is humble enough to call himself 'God' in japanese), but much prolly god's right hand middle finger.
You have nothing good to say anymore, good bye. :(
It ain't Gustin vs Synergy by any means. Despite your best efforts, we hardly ever fight you, and I think last weekend was the very first time that we have actually sieged against Synergy EVER. Sure, we've dicked around with you on the field, but picking off a few peeps from the sideline doesn't really count as sieging against each other.
So what you're saying is "Synergy doesn't want to put forth the work required to take Aden/Giran, but we sure wish someone else would."
Thanks for your support guy!
Bigs they are just ****** they cant do a **** thing about it.
ROFL.. they are killing me man.
They prove they are stronger than us by taking Dion. Then they [censored] at us for not going after the 2 castles they say they are not strong enough to take.
That doesn't make a **** bit of sense.
Yes it does, They are saying they want others to try to Bigs! Of ALL the people on boards, I thought you would get it. They understand that everyone is at war with them, and obviously willing to ban together in a common goal to kill them on a seige field. What I and I think they are also saying, is why not put your war aside, ban together for the common goal of getting Aden!! One of you will surely get it as people working together equals alot more numbers.
Thats all they are saying, would make for more interesting seiges, then next week NM and Syn, or GG whoever dint get the castle can go at it.
Its better than One Ally owning the two greatest castles for over a year now. Stop thinking other allies care about you, they only help because it benefits them somewhere else. Start doing something that would benefit you, like getting aden
Synergy' wishes to make a multi-sided pvp server will only occur when Synergy and his great afk sitting leader purely and simply leave the game. Sorry to be rude but its the only and real truth. I guess ppl are tired to see gustin highest players being half real players half computers.
It seems that Gustin needs a good shower.
First MS problem...
Then PvC (Players vs Computers).
And finally a ****ed real fight without overpowered computer buffs would be cool.
Yes Ive never heard that line before. If youre ignorant enough to only look at yourself(or your clan, who is clean for the most part..) then your world makes sense to you. You dont bother to consider the people you fight with. You say you have to destroy 'the botters'. But youre only attacking Syn, because theyve been successful in killing you. Sorry to be rude, but youre being a fool.
Synergy signed up to defend and it became all vs them.
You dont sign up to defend and it isnt all vs you.
This server does not revolve around you Rob. You should know better. Try attacking Aden in 2 weeks. It hasnt been NM defending Aden. But then again I see you are not looking past your own nose, so you cant see the bigger picture.
Its not N's fault that Syn has more enemies. Its not N's fault that they'd rather help us defend a castle than help Syn attack one.
Its not like Syn hasnt had the reputation of crashing sieges for the hell of it or benefiting those that have signed up either.
Cry about Dion being zerged but you really cant be complaining since Syn didnt sign up to attack.
Why would Synergy sign up to attack a castle that belongs to a clan that is in their alliance?
There were over 10 clans attacking and there were under 5 defending...how's that not a zerg....? No matter what that night the castle was going to be taken anyways, the numbers were rediculous.
What I find amusing about your first paragraph in what I quoted was the fact that I can look back to almost a year ago when Nightmare broke off from EA and I can apply the same thing you said to it. I remember when there were seiges everyone and their mother would sign up to help EA attack Nightmare, tons of random clans did it, heck DragoonSlayers or whatever they were called back then even joined their alliance, it's just the whole bandwagon factor. Back then Nightmare had TONS of enemies and was seen as the badguys, now Synergy has TONS of enemies, and are seen as the badguys. (Esp. after the seal competition that just passed)
I'm pretty sure that if Synergy decided to do something to other people's liking everyone and their mother would hop aboard the Synergy Bandwagon too. This can also be applied to anyone's alliance actually. But the fact remains, Synergy is doing things that doesn't appeal to everyone so "everyone" chooses not to like them.
And don't acat lie you wouldn't wanna siege crash if you had the proper numbers to do it. It's fun as hell to crash sieges :) Everyone's done it at least once!
Pignation was not part of Synergy before the siege.
You are again wrong. You are making a habit of trying to prove your point with mistakes and misinformation. Try working on that.
Yes they were outnumbered by a lot. So what?
Where is it stated all of your enemies cant show up to kill you? Or should those enemies not do it when enemies of theirs stand to benefit? I can tell you G4b happily put aside his hate for me for 2 hours to kill Synergy.
Just as he put aside his hate for others to siege me not to long back.
Where in the history of this game has anything happened that would make you think anything different was going to happen?
Sorry, but Syn ****** them off more then we did this time around.
Pignation was not part of Synergy before the siege.
Unnoficially, but come on you didn't see that one coming? Come on! It was a given that PIGS were gonna join Synergy!
You are again wrong. You are making a habit of trying to prove your point with mistakes and misinformation. Try working on that.
Oh hush old man...
Yes they were outnumbered by a lot. So what?
A lot is an understatement...
Where is it stated all of your enemies cant show up to kill you? Or should those enemies not do it when enemies of theirs stand to benefit?
The "put aside our hatred for each other and work together!" was originally made up to fight MagicSword/LightSword/RR and kick them off the server, not to ban together and fight Synergy, considering what all the posts on Orph-us said, since that was the main goal right? You realize that fighting Synergy is taking your attention off the real issue? (Raid Boss Farmers)
I can tell you G4b happily put aside his hate for me for 2 hours to kill Synergy.
Just as he put aside his hate for others to siege me not to long back.
You guys will be suffering from withdrawls soon, just you wait!
Where in the history of this game has anything happened that would make you think anything different was going to happen?
Sorry, but Syn ****** them off more then we did this time around.
Let's hold hands, and stand in a circle, sing songs...
Unnoficially, but come on you didn't see that one coming? Come on! It was a given that PIGS were gonna join Synergy!
Yes we did see it coming. How is that relevant at all? So you are saying everyone would have showed up to kill Pigs had Synergy stayed away?
Oh hush old man...
Im under 30.
A lot is an understatement...
Point?
The "put aside our hatred for each other and work together!" was originally made up to fight MagicSword/LightSword/RR and kick them off the server, not to ban together and fight Synergy, considering what all the posts on Orph-us said, since that was the main goal right? You realize that fighting Synergy is taking your attention off the real issue? (Raid Boss Farmers)
Wow. Just wow. Fighting Synergy IN ONE SIEGE, is not taking our attention off of the real issue.
At the siege we didnt ban together to fight Synergy. Rep/GG/Req was there to take Dion. We would have fought anyone who got in the way of that goal.
Let's hold hands, and stand in a circle, sing songs...
You hypocrits say we should have fought each other but there is no way in hell you would have done that yourself. Seems to me what is good for you can not be good for others if it is against you. Congrats on reaching left field, sit down and enjoy the view.
At one point in time all of you have taken advantage of others wanting to kill each other to get what you want. Now we do it and [censored] SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH GUSTIN KEEEL THE SERVER!!!!
Rep/Req/GG wanted a rematch from the previous period when Syn/Pig took the castle from us. Pretty standard stuff.
A portion (not even all) of Synergy's long list of enemies showed up of thier own accord to fight them.
Anyone who realistically thinks that NM needed an invitation to show up when they saw the siege list of attackers and defenders is just plain ole STUPID.
There's no banding together to defeat Syn or any of that other BS. Stop crying, it was a good fight and a fun siege. I can't even believe that after all the talk of wanting PvP that anyone could even say anything but GF. That was 2hr's straight of Mass PvP, for the most part, the fights I saw taking place off the field were pretty even. We (Rep/Req/GG) kept our forces on the siege field as much as possible to defend our flags, and the holes in the castle wall, so realistically we hardly fought at all. I think I died once the whole night.
It was fun. I like sieging, it's exciting. If it were up to me, I'd have preferred a little less help from other peeps so I could have gotten more action myself, but honestly I've pretty much grown accustomed to sieges being very one-sided. It's a rare thing for the attackers and defenders to be so evenly matched that it actually comes down to say the last 15 minutes. Aside from going totally carebear and setting up the sieges in advance I don't think there's [censored] we can do about it. I've fought my fair share of being on the losing side, so I know how bad it sucks to fight against 4,5,6, even 10 to 1 odds. It can still be fun though, and Synergy is good at that [censored] anyhow.
GF everyone, we got 9 days and we can do it again!!
No way synergy managed to gat themselves a lot of "friends" that will love to hunt them down wherever they go.
So, u can't have a fight with Synergy without the apearence of those "friends" .
Rep/Req/GG didn't asked us for any help. We signed to attack because we don't like PIGS running castles. Syn signed to defend, cool, more fun. You can expect us to go after them in any siege, invited or uninvited.
Lets all PVP each other while synergy bots and PL all of their characters and recruits as many former NM and 3rd classers as they possibly can. Also lets waste our time pvping each other so Magicsword continues to grow and we can get ganked by syn's superiority at pling and botting. I can't believe they are actually stupid to cry here about how everyone only pvps them. Wasn't synergy the losers that invited magicsword to do antharas ? Now that is what I call desperation. No antharas no paycheck uh? You wanted pvp you got pvp. Are we screwing your business with farmers as well? Good. Stop criying about clans pvping you. If it was up to synergy every single lv 76 in the server would be in synergy alliance picking lower lvl alliances and then having the audacity to brag about it here. Unfourtunatly for syn most ppl have their integrity and identity and they know better than to throw that away and destroy their alliances in order to follow ******ed farmers like Kamisama. Well Malevolence is the exception and the pigs but those ******s never had an identity in the first place.
wari u was the first one that withdrawned fron the pig gank :P
carebear action?
tell me pls ...i wanna know was because of the watter splashes during the siege?
Are you kidding me...
Think I want to be part of Synergy
Part of an alliance filled with people who bot, cheat, powerlvl, ebay, etc... Full of idiots who thought in c1 it was fun to just kill everyone and drive people off the server? Clans like PeeKay who were full of carebear players who through all of c2, sat on 10th toi with no pvp? The only clan I respect in that alliance is pignation, and its sad it had to go that way.
Calling me a carebear is funny
Whats your ingame name
i'll pay you a good visit
Keep running your mouth...
wari u was the first one that withdrawned fron the pig gank :P
carebear action?
tell me pls ...i wanna know was because of the watter splashes during the siege?
Are you kidding me...
Think I want to be part of Synergy
Part of an alliance filled with people who bot, cheat, powerlvl, ebay, etc... Full of idiots who thought in c1 it was fun to just kill everyone and drive people off the server? Clans like PeeKay who were full of carebear players who through all of c2, sat on 10th toi with no pvp? The only clan I respect in that alliance is pignation, and its sad it had to go that way.
Calling me a carebear is funny
Whats your ingame name
i'll pay you a good visit
Keep running your mouth...
Clans like PeeKay who were full of carebear players who through all of c2, sat on 10th toi with no pvp?
Hate to say it but you getting pk'd by EA doesn't count as PvP. We had wars with NM(very brief) and Anarchy99 for couple months. We fought EA Dec to Feb of c2 as well, till you AEA idiots created that stupid Unforgiven alliance. If you had so much PvP then why is your PvP count so sad?
1 vs 1 my sub ?? HAHAHHAHAHAHHA kk mabye not...
I am carebear, i love to XP :) makes me happy in pants when xp bar goes up, makes me sad in pants when it goes down :(
Clans like PeeKay who were full of carebear players who through all of c2, sat on 10th toi with no pvp?
Hate to say it but you getting pk'd by EA doesn't count as PvP. We had wars with NM(very brief) and Anarchy99 for couple months. We fought EA Dec to Feb of c2 as well, till you AEA idiots created that stupid Unforgiven alliance. If you had so much PvP then why is your PvP count so sad?
Oh I didn't know 300+ PvP count is sad, plus i don't even know how many sin eaters I have done in my life time... in c2, I hardly ever got PKed, I was also never around for underground alliance, I didn't rejoin RC until after that had dissolved, Oldey was another person I never wanted to be led by. I can honestly say I maybe got pk'ed a total of under 5 times in c2, and Killed plenty more than that. Better than being a carebear lvling to 70+ cause you were scared to pvp at lower lvls. If anyone says PeeKay isn't full of c2 carebears, they are nuts.
Are you kidding me...
Think I want to be part of Synergy
Part of an alliance filled with people who bot, cheat, powerlvl, ebay, etc... Full of idiots who thought in c1 it was fun to just kill everyone and drive people off the server? Clans like PeeKay who were full of carebear players who through all of c2, sat on 10th toi with no pvp? The only clan I respect in that alliance is pignation, and its sad it had to go that way.
Calling me a carebear is funny
Whats your ingame name
i'll pay you a good visit
Keep running your mouth...
Word in '06
why the hell ur in Syn ? u know that this means losing the rest of "honor" to be a legit player ...
when i see u running arround in the past u where *cough* more red than white, but always respectable...
call the RB farmers what u want, but those ppl make more ppl losing fun before...
to see that NC give a ****...
Oh and sorry we killed one of EA's clans too (Inner*******) and losers like that are in clans in synergy, who decided to end the war when me and one other spellsinger and went killed their 7 man party, then they let us bring a stripped dagger and go and pk them all over and over and over, and we'd just res the dagger kill it, and just constantly pk them, and they just stood there waiting for big bad ea to help, thx!
Hatred for RC aside, you always were fun to have as an enemy. What you planning on doing anyways?
You know I'm talking about Malevolence, the clan that died after one war
Meh. Most clans should consider themselves lucky if they ever get a war like that in thier time playing L2. M really suprised me from going hardcore carebear to hardcore PvP at the drop of a dime. Was a good war. Alot of power shifts and no decisive winner. First time ever on Gustin that KoS really meant KoS.
Hatred for RC aside, you always were fun to have as an enemy. What you planning on doing anyways?
You know I'm talking about Malevolence, the clan that died after one war
Meh. Most clans should consider themselves lucky if they ever get a war like that in thier time playing L2. M really suprised me from going hardcore carebear to hardcore PvP at the drop of a dime. Was a good war. Alot of power shifts and no decisive winner. First time ever on Gustin that KoS really meant KoS.
Hell, even i was killing people!
I still remeber that time i got you running back into aden!
You know I'm talking about Malevolence, the clan that died after one war
The Malevolence vs NM war was the largest running war in Gustins history noob, almost 9 months long with more PvP per side then anyone else combined. EA vs AEA was nice nostalgia wise but that war basically went from Oct-Feb. (which you missed atleast a month of going to WoW) You were a non-factor in those wars much like the M vs NM one wari, most of your clanmates would agree.
Hey ****** sorry for the history lesson but while Malevolence was botting and being carebearish SoS was alredy fighting NM. Besides that alliance couldn't find a less pathetic way to disappear.
Hey ****** sorry for the history lesson but while Malevolence was botting and being carebearish SoS was alredy fighting NM. Besides that alliance couldn't find a less pathetic way to disappear.
Haha, you said pathetic!
Oh, incase you didn't notice, no one was talking to you fool. You have some serious mental problems in need of medication and lots of group therapy.
You are the carebear peon talking [censored] about Malevolence this malevolence that. Malevolenced served as the tool for Kamisama to come back to the game and now its nothing. Encourage group theraphy when you recover your masculinity.
In game he would bsoe before I even enter his range :( Then he would most likely excuse his femininity by saying he was cdling or some [censored]. As if doing vamp claw + corpse life drain was some rocket science.
There is a difference between bsoeing from a full party and bsoeing from a 1v1. Wouldn't surprise that someone as feminine as you isn't be able to tell the difference.