keep in mind increaseing con for stun resist in pvp is not such a bad move
increaseing con to resist stun in pve is IMHO moronic
Out of curiosity, is this a fact based on tests that were ran by players or based on the description of enhancements in the lineage website where it says con raises shock resistance. The reason I ask is because I don't really trust at all what the website says :D. Another reason being is because even as a DE with the lowest con, I don't see a difference in being stunned more than my orc or human. I only ran a few small tests on myself though...That's as far as pvp goes.
As far as pve goes, I really am not sure about once again as sometimes I get stunned 5 times in a row, and sometimes I never get stunned...
So fact or fiction on the con and shock thing. It would make sense, but you never know :p.
I am not sure if what I say is true, but I tend to believe that stunning takes into account the difference in CON between the two targets. So I think an orc tyrant has more chances to stun a phantom ranger than the opposite (both have stun but orc much higher CON). I don't know if other stats (like STR) take any role into this.
But as I said, it's from the little I've seen, can't be 100% sure. If someone knows better please share it with us.