odds on sucessfully enchanting weapons

Player Questions Started Last reply 13 posts
ballswild #1
after just breaking my DS trying for +5.....scrounging up enough adena to buy an new one sucked. for future reference...i was wondering is anyone knows the approximate odds on successfully enchanting a c grade weapon/
ballswild #2
three post down awnsered my question.............NVM
Shrimpstoo #3
Glad youve seen it !
I was gonna say " Oh no , not another one of those posts !"

For future refenrence .... for everyone.. plz make a search before posting !
Almost everything has already been covered at some point.
LofL #4
66% for every enchant and it doesnt help doing it in church, once a week etc. Its like gamble and you have 2/3 chance of making it.
Abisha #5
taticaly you can enchent from +0 to +16 in 1 time
taticaly you can blow up 10 weapons from 3 to +4
odds will be 33% you blow 66% you have success
they say it's matter of luck while well i not gonna start a new HUGH topic about it
Elrohir #6

taticaly you can enchent from +0 to +16 in 1 time
taticaly you can blow up 10 weapons from 3 to +4


What does "taticaly" mean?


odds will be 33% you blow 66% you have success


Where's the other 1%?
Abisha #7
taticaly might be the wrong word of chooise but i mean you can have a posability
the other 1% is the error calculation whatever people call it
their is a HUGH topic about this hard to miss it
Elrohir #8
I don't even think it's a word and, for the life of me, I cannot figure out what you are trying to say...

and 33 + 66 != 100, even for very small values of 100.
_Meate_ #9

...even for very small values of 100.



Huh? A small value of 100?

At any rate, the OP already had his question answered, so no reason to keep posting the odds, theories, rumors, speculations and all that stuff. One of the tips at game startup clarifies this as well.
Elrohir #10


...even for very small values of 100.



Huh? A small value of 100?


Inside joke.

I had a math professor that used to say that "1 + 1 never equals 3. Even for very large values of 1."
_Meate_ #11
Got it!
beanstation #12

I don't even think it's a word and, for the life of me, I cannot figure out what you are trying to say...

and 33 + 66 != 100, even for very small values of 100.



Think he is going for "technically", but that is just a guess.

:>