Caster Supremacy?

I made a Dark Fighter and my friend also made a Dark Fighter.. little did we realize until level 10 that casters seemed superior in every way. Mobs were killed by her in 2 hits without her taking a single point in damage? Is there any point in continuing with warrior classes when casters are so blatently riddiculous? Please give information to contradict this.

make archer.

laugh.

Yea and especially since sleep is nerfed they will use tatoos at 52+ and then super casting. Get over it. Thats how they are.

make archer

+1

Or nuker lol. :eek:

all farmers are using fighters tho..

Nukers are very good at dealing high damage in a very short time to mobs. But (unless it's a spellhowler or necromancer) they have also lots of downtime due to mp, which makes them unwanted in parties, and in fully buffed pvp their damage to other players is far lower than fully buffed archer damage because of all the resistance buffs. Still, for soloing a spellhowler is pretty good. So while nukers have maybe an easy time at lower levels, they pay a price for it. If you go for AW,BD or PR, you will get parties easily and have fun in pvp, too.

So i'd be right in saying I should make an Assasin/Rogue right now instead of the Palus Knight I had planned on? Nice to know archers are viable and I can keep the character I made :P

So i'd be right in saying I should make an Assasin/Rogue right now instead of the Palus Knight I had planned on? Nice to know archers are viable and I can keep the character I made :P

Well, it depends on what you want to do. Palus Kngith can go either shilen knight (hell of a lot of skills) or Blade Dancer which is always wanted in parties.

But if you want to do a lot of damage in pvp then go dagger. Or Archer.

Or go nuker though what varaya said was true. Some of the damage is mitigated by protection buffs.

playing a nuker is a lonely road. most of the time you will be soloing, and have a lot of downtime. ofc you can duo/trio with other nukers/SEs, but I would say if you dont like solo, dont play a nuker.

all true,

one upside tough, for raidbosses we're very wanted.
but, if i had to chose again, i would take another road.
i would go bishop i guess

playing a nuker is a lonely road. most of the time you will be soloing, and have a lot of downtime. ofc you can duo/trio with other nukers/SEs, but I would say if you dont like solo, dont play a nuker.

Archers solo most of their time to, but without the downtime.

Quote:
playing a nuker is a lonely road. most of the time you will be soloing, and have a lot of downtime. ofc you can duo/trio with other nukers/SEs, but I would say if you dont like solo, dont play a nuker.



Archers solo most of their time to, but without the downtime.

neither mages nor archers have much in the way of downtime these days but their kill speed is far faster

Quote:
playing a nuker is a lonely road. most of the time you will be soloing, and have a lot of downtime. ofc you can duo/trio with other nukers/SEs, but I would say if you dont like solo, dont play a nuker.



Archers solo most of their time to, but without the downtime.

neither mages nor archers have much in the way of downtime these days but their kill speed is far faster



Yes, we can't always be better then mages can we?

The only dark elven class that's not 'viable' at a high level is the Shillien Elder, and even they have their users.

All the other classes have situations where they really shine.