I have heard from people that glads get +4 str -4con dyes,but i wondered you know... isn't a glad w/o tatoos equal with one that has? e.x base stats (around 60lvl), str 40(lets say 700p.atk) and con 43(about 3,7k hp).Then glad no.1 gets +4 str -4con and he gets str 44(not count armor)which increases his atk at about 800+ but then his hp drops at about 3,2k.Well, i'm not sure about the numbers(calculations mostly), but you get the point.Aren't they somehow equal?This concerns a friend of mine as well,any help appreciated:)
yeah sometiem in B or A grade is when you should start thinking of tatoos IF your economy will allow it, if not.. well good things are worth waiting for ^^
Fortunately money is not a problem( got a rich in-game brother...).should i go +str -con?
If you doubt between STR and DEX, always go for STR first...that way you will see a nice increase in damage, but also can see how much HP you lose cause of your -CON.
Get tatoos at level 40.00.. why wait lol, you're gonna do PvE for the majority of your coming levels, so +STR +DEX and DD the hell out of those mobs. You're one-shot for anyone 70+ anyways.. jeez.
i might go +str -con,it's not hp that concerns me but stun resist.da's and archers will @@ me with stuns.by the way has any1 noticed the stun ,fallen orc shamans do when they get ''tigered''(forsaken plains).correct me if i'm wrong but their stun(shock) is 100% pure success.i got about 30/30 stuns and the whole of my party as well.can't be a coincidence for sure.
Get tatoos at level 40.00.. why wait lol, you're gonna do PvE for the majority of your coming levels, so +STR +DEX and DD the hell out of those mobs. You're one-shot for anyone 70+ anyways.. jeez.
Cause maybe, just maybe having -10 Con (full tats + Plated Leather) at lvl 40 brings you down to 800hp, and that might be a little bit dangerous hunting the best mobs to xp?
Unless you want loads of SP.
yeah I used to solo those on my howler. those nasty kitty orcs had me laying looking at the sky on more than one occassion once stun had landed! don't think it was !00% though but close..