Raid Boss Nuker

After my nuker vs archer thread, I decided I'll probably subclass a nuker.

Since my Overlord is already a half-decent pvp and siege class (better than meleers :P), I'd probably use that for most alliance events.

On the other hand, the alliance I'm with is missing a lot in terms of nukers so raid bosses go slowwwwww.

Would a necro be a sufficient raid boss killer character, or do too many of the higher raids have dark magic resistance?

Would SH be better?

I have a 72 SE already which should be 74 by the time I sub my OL, so leveling those two would be prefered. Unless anyone has some really good points on why a sps or sorc would overpower the SH or necro vs raid bosses.

Thank you in advance on your suggestions.

Since when you need nukers to kill a RB?CoV archer party kills Golkonda (lvl 79 RB).1 archer party with 4 dracs in it though.

I'd go with SH ove necro due to higher INT and variaty of nukes (wind/dark/CDL).

we can kill every raid boss with 1 archer party. nukers on the other hand do about 1/4th the DPS our archer party puts out with same buffs.

we can kill every raid boss with 1 archer party. nukers on the other hand do about 1/4th the DPS our archer party puts out with same buffs.

why would you buff an archer and nuker by the same buffs ?

and your alliance has monopolized the epic boss jewellery market. i got 5a says if you didnt have everyone in top gear+6, you wouldnt be taking out raids in 1 archer party.

this is why i stay low level. far too much competition for the higher end of the game.

We don't have enough WC + BD + SdS + warlocks to form reliable archer parties.

SEs, on the other hand, are a dime a dozen, so getting recharges/emp/wm wouldn't be an issue.

O-M-G.The situation in my clan is opposite.We got everything else EXCEPT SEs.
I would say SH is better also.Necros dont have the clear mind passive nukers get.