Identical m.atk , identical SA, still there is any difference between them ? I mean, using hall or spirit may influence in any way any "passive stats" that are no visible? some say yes, and thats why I ask here. Char we speak about is a Soultaker. thank you in advance.
If I remember correctly a translated text I read on EllieBelly, the damage is more static (I mean in a short range) with a sword, while there is a bigger damage variation with Blunt, with a bigger rate.
There is something about M.Critical Rate too, but I can't remember :D
Dynasty stuff seems like a very good weapon when it will become s76,you can keep it untill 84lvls.His higher m.atack balances the lost m.atack from sigil,so if u dont use a rare sigil the difference will be too small.
About difference on magic sword/blunt,i did some testing(before freya)on npc and i found that with blunt i got more m.criticals but i had a bigger variance on mag.dmg,with sword i was making almost same dmg on every hit but less m.crit.
There was a rumor that you get more easily passive wm on a sword(also before freya)but no idead if thats true.
Neither, get Dynasty Staff, more m.atk than Icarus Hall/Spirit & cheaper to SA with acumen :)
& can be used at 76 after high 5 :)
Dyn staff has 222 matk, icarus hall/spirit have 217. So 5 matk is not gonna scale in 4% offered by the sigil. And i don't speak about other bonus( 17% mana regen). Anyway, I have atm S wep, I'll use dyn set from wednesday, and gather some money for a good icarus mage wep :). Ty vm for your answers.
Yeh... iimo you should buy my +7 Dynasty Mace on Naia... 246 matk 1 handed =)...
As far as I know it's probably the only +7 Dynasty Mace... it's so hard to ++ mage weapon. Blunt is even harder to OE than a sword. 38% vs 43% after +4+