Im currently in the market for buying a weapon for my warrior, i was a glad before i hit 85 and personally for me i am going to go for duals, mainly because i think they look cool on a human rather than a 2 handed sword
For pve the 2h sword is hands down better than duals. for pvp i would prefer duals. haste+focus on the sword will yield more dps than any choice you choose with duals. If you want a well-rounded approach get both
Two handed Mace.
why they removed them from end game, i'll never quite understand.
i guess they just wanted people to use dual weapons...
typically it's a personal choice.
two handed swords are slower feeling.
dual swords might be more entertaining.
personally i think you should go Fist or pole.
2h blunt had same crit rate/dmg multiplers as dualblunt weapons and as i know dualblunts be realy usefull only with rask focus SA, cose with 100 crit rate it has lower dps then sword
Again refer to my post above. +4 slasher focus/haste will do more damage than +4 duals haste/dmg.
2H hits harder but also slower. Everyone chooses by own preferences. I wouldn't choose 2h because it's more suited for pve and by that I should get duals/2h/spear.. Why waste adena? Duals are for sure better for pvp also don't see any problems at pve too(especially with the right gear) + spear at crowd of mobs.
P.S. Tyrr going for haste/dmg sa should be noob.