Doubts in choosing the healer.

All heal, give debuf, etc..
But which one in PvP 1v1 (against other classes, proves more effective)?
- Healer Summoner vs, vs Dagger, Archer vs ...

Best Chance to pick up and resist debuffs.

I appreciate everyone's attention.

I'm not sure if i get this.

You ask which healer is best for pvp 1v1?

Shilen Elder for PVP (that little matk boost is not for nothing :) )

Shilen Elder for PVP (that little matk boost is not for nothing :) )

It's pretty big considering the lack of boosts healers don't get.

But yeah SE Healer is the way to go for PvP, which sadly you will get your *** handed to you unless you RMT and NCCoin yourself to victory. :<

Actually, Evas Saint for pvp.

Hey I have to agree with you ( sigh*) Eva is the better one for PVP ( casting speed) or is it?????

facepalm

No, not the cast speed, it can be capped on any healer, since I can easily cap it on my dark elf one.

It's the reuse, in particular the reuse on party cleanse.

No, not the cast speed, it can be capped on any healer, since I can easily cap it on my dark elf one.

It's the reuse, in particular the reuse on party cleanse.

That's for PvP skirmishes for parties. I was talking about 1v1, unless ofc there's some insight that you have that I'm not aware about. ^.^

1v1 has never ever mattered.

For anything.

Join a clan, do mass pvp instead.

She asked about 1v1. SS > ES for 1v1.

Whether you think it matters ... doesn't matter.

And why would SE be better for 1v1?

I'd take your word for it, if it wasnt that you are known to speak out of your behind, mostly about subjects where you have an undergeared toon to make examples around.

So please, enlighten me.

From a level 98 dual class pvp healer perspective with ++ r95, some epics, etc.

ES > SS

Will be 99/99/80/80 in a couple of weeks. Stay tuned.

Wonder if Trensharo thinks what you think matters.

Stay tuned.

Also, why ES>SS?

And, why SS>ES?

Healer (doesnt matter if EE/SE/Cardi) is as good as player is good. That's all.

People will always trying to explain why cool down is better than -mp consump and 20% matk or why SE passive is better than EE passive.

Wonder if Trensharo thinks what you think matters.

Stay tuned.

Also, why ES>SS?

And, why SS>ES?

10% reuse gives more DPS than 20% M.attk
10% reuse gives more survivability than 20% M.attk

More debuff immunity time
Quicker progressive heals

The only real perk to SS is the MP consumption reduction passive and to PvP ready characters, MP is not an issue... at all... not even in the slightest bit...

Thank you.

I will now wait for Trensharos rebuttal.

Go go Trensh.

At lower levels, isn't the reduction negliable?

Yes. I think what is being discussed is endgame though.

I could however be wrong, my thoughts on the matter dont seem to count.

Trensh, we talking low 90's perhaps?

Trensh went AWOL.

Your thoughts are pretty spot on most of the time, but people see you're curt critical responses as confrontational and butthurt...Internet ****** and hormones ftw...